Again,....what is the crime here?

No, he isn’t, and no, it doesn't. Now stop making me defend Elon fucking Musk from your misinformation and maybe look something up before you decide to say it's true because you'd like it to be. 

At least in the United States, Section 230 would prevent that. Generally speaking, the platform cannot be held liable for content that somebody else uploads to it.

Even if it’s true that he’s responsible for what’s on his platform (and therefore presumably liable for it), what exactly would be the lawsuit here?

I’m not the biggest Musk fan (.....or a Musk fan at all), but why would he be on the hook for a lawsuit here?

Only one person here was thinking about pornographic content while reading this comment....

Yeah this is nothing new. “Swifties” who use X must be the lowest rung of Swifties, cause like the article mentions, 4CHan. But her AI nudity is everywhere. Just go to Deviant Art and do a search for “Taylor Swift”. About 5-10 results in, it suddenly becomes all AI Swift porn lol. Yes it’s wrong and it should be…

I think you missed the point, but I guess swifties aren’t smartees

Back in the day one could read a news story and demand ‘pics, or it didn’t happen’.  Sadly those days are gone

Because people want to hold out hope that this isn’t the new normal. 

The US will protect US based manufacturers from the Chinese price dumping vehicles here. Keeping an industrial base is far more important than cheap cars. Not to mention there really isn’t any cheap cars done by anyone because they don’t make profit on them.

The average cost of a new car is something like 45K the last…

“It kind of creates a loophole for automakers to target more affluent customers who are probably more likely to be able to afford and actually get approved to buy an EV,” she said.

As someone who lived in Florida- I can tell you why this law is; because 300 decibel Stereos are beyond obnoxious. At the beach or sitting in your house.

Another way to look at it could be by the number of tickets per 100k by different age brackets.

Of course, the claim of unequal enforcement solely due to racism sets up the obvious counterpoint question: Do Black drivers disproportionately play loud music more often than white drivers?

So, only black people drive around with their music up too loud? I don’t understand the point of this......it’s saying that more black drivers are being harassed than should be - but one person got ticketed 5 times in one day? You’d think after the second ticket they would be aware of what they were doing that was…

the insurance industry is basically a bunch of legal extortionists.

It doesn’t really matter who the national leadership of the UAW endorses, the union vote is going to Trump. Granted this isn’t super scientific but a quick stroll through the UAW shop floor where I work has Trump winning the vote of the rank and file by a pretty wide margin. If the toolbox has a sticker on it, it’s a…

GM, and particularly Scott Miller are delusional. NO ONE wants this. Having the phone interface so you can play your music on the apps you want and use the phone navigation is what people want. All Scott Miller and GM are doing is making sure many people won’t even consider their EVs at all.

You realize that the power generation plants needed to power the battery chargers use far more energy than those “gas-guzzling trucks” (I won’t go into the details of the environmental disaster the rare-earth mines are). Those battery charging stations aren’t powered by rainbows and unicorn farts. It’s usually going…