mrbluesky-old
MrBlueSky
mrbluesky-old

but can't bear to throw away?

I feel a little (safer) if I put it in quotes:

You got to be more timely when you reply online. : ) I said that a couple of months ago, which is a millenium in internet terms. Whatever I felt then, I don't anymore. I'd even have to scroll up to the article to see what I was b*ching about in the first place, but that would take work. :)

When is it not "flu season"? Whatever that is. It seems people are in or out of a "bug" or have "the flu" where I live, year round.

It would be nice to have more supporting studies on this, but I'm not holding my breath. :P

I'd be curious to know more about why this is happening. All my addons are listed and working fine after the update to v7.

in and out of the city

I think they have the speed thing right. They always did. What I don't care for, are the ui and the mindset.

I don't suppose anyone will give a s**t by this point, at this stage in the comment narrative, and maybe soon I won't either. IE9 is still faster on this system. I *do* appreciate FF's url shortening though. btw, aren't there browser recipes that call for url shortening?? No?

There was another Lh article. It said to change this to False in about.config

This lousy late night comment has been brought to you by Hither & Yawn, Attorneys At Law

I thought yawning was a mechanism to get more oxygen up there.

I'll have you know that none of my computers are relics They are historical PCs . And I'm their curator/interpretive center.

Whitson, ok I promise to read things over. Browser articles have come to scare me a bit. It is a very good thing we are all in different locations and can't really engage in a serious browser fight. : ) those Opera users are especially violent, all seven of them. :0 :)

Nothing like a list of hotstrings in an ahk script. Tiz to live. :)

If I'm really curious about the url,

Should I read the article? Should I read these comments? I've done neither. It's like getting bills in the mail, or checking my bank balance. Dare I look? : )

Around here, I can't even give away a 3in1 inkjet. I can't blame anyone either. It's worth maybe $20, maybe. But the two cartridges it needs are more than $20 a piece, after taxes. What else can be said, except that inkjet sucks in more ways than one. Laser FTW!

That sounds dirty. You take it back! :)

uh... pic = no shit? :)