So you really want to get hung up on semantics? Call it whatever you want, I just prefer fastback sedans with a liftback.
So you really want to get hung up on semantics? Call it whatever you want, I just prefer fastback sedans with a liftback.
Why would you deny others what they want? You won't ever have to buy one.
Considering incentives and discounts have 2018 Stelvios at around 8k off MSRP right now, this seems appropriate for a used one, but the mileage is a bit high for that price IMO. I picked up my Giulia this year as a leftover 2017 with 20% off MSRP, so for about the same price as a loaded accord. It did have a…
Why stop? In the US those kinds of shenanigans can get you elected president.
Nvm, there are no original thoughts left to have.
Modern Alfas have no manual version in the US, to get them in neutral you have to start the engine, or screw a specific sized bolt into a specific socket under the transmission. If you have no electrical power it won’t be possible to disengage the parking brake. Most people won’t be able to push them if they won’t…
Even the base Giulias are still nearly as gorgeous. The dealership I scored mine from has brand new 2017 models left over for 14-15k off the sticker price right now. This is hands-down the best deal that can be had on a new car as beautiful as these are. You probably won’t find a used one for that price.
And right now there are brand new 2017 Giulias available for less than 30k. Definitely the best looking new car available at that price.
The key questions is how much. Back when the concept was announced they hinted at a similar starting price as the GLC, so around $40k. If they can sell with these specs at that price they will sell all of them they can make.
Considering there are left over 2017 Alfa Romeo Giulias that can be had for under $35k this seems less appealing. I know they aren’t the paragon of reliability that Camrys are, but a warranty is a warranty. 2018 models are seeing huge discounts too lately. Mine gets way more smiles per gallon than any Camry ever will.
Well just earlier this year I picked up a 2007 volvo S60 for my son that cost less than this car. It’s been pretty solid so far.
Because I don’t want to overpay for a 28 year old beater? I think you’ve missed the point.
We are thinking you could have something 15 years newer for that price.
You thought the G37 coupe was ugly? Do you live in Colorado or west coast somewhere?
The sad thing about these Q40's is that they were all pretty much neutered from the factory without the sport package that was available on the G37's and the Q50's. If you wanted to upgrade the suspension yourself (and the brakes, and add a LSD, better wheels etc.) it could be a great car. If you want that stuff though…
If you really think these two cars are anywhere close to the same level, you should really check out the Infiniti. It’s a RWD or AWD crossover/wagon that uses the VQ engine and an honest-to-God non-CVT transmission. These two things probably were the same color, but that was perhaps the only similarity. I’d drive it…
Trump couldn’t care less about the measly presidential salary. He has saved himself so much from the tax bill he pushed through it pales by comparison.
I agree this car was ok for it’s time, and is still not too bad. I actually considered one of these earlier this year for my son’s first car, but after taking it on a test drive and noticing how all the plastic bits inside have fared over the years, it was a pass. The sun visors wouldn’t stay in place because that…
I think lifted cars are a natural response to all the huge trucks and SUV’s on the roads today. A normal sized car seems like an ant in comparison, nobody wants to be the ant among giants. Seriously, there needs to be some kind of height limit. Otherwise, where does this end?
To their credit, much of what I know about most cars doesn’t apply to a Tesla.