These were actually what caught my eye when browsing the auctions. I could think of quite a few people and business back in my hometown that would love a 6x6 this cheap, even if they would need to spend some more to have it shipped/plated/repaired, etc.

I don't think studios actually buy stuff like this, they rent them from some military prop company.

Actually, cod requires quite a bit of skill to do well. But then again, so does high level pokemon.

I'm not sure you understand basic argument structure, who is playing devils advocate? Why would that ever be necessary when discussing the meaning of a web article, it's response from GG, or what things like collusion mean?

Well, your responses certainty are at least.

So yeah, you didn't read the articles. Nor do you seem to understand what 'collusion' means, or why the quinspiracy was not newsworthy.

They do mention a 'partnership with sony' when they announced the game, which makes me think co-development. They also note sony is doing the USF4 post for the ps4 as part of the deal.

Sadly, it all came too late to change the consoles direction it seems. Even with the recent, rather excellent games, sales are going no where fast, regardless of region.

Ren and Stimpy. Children's cartoon about a gay couple, which they hinted at for a long, long time, without the censors catching on. Rocko's modern life did similar stuff, and got away with most of them.

No, Gawker offered an opinion. Censorship is when you can force a change, something gawker doesn't have the ability to do, save for it's own content. 'Calling for censorship' is meaningless as a bash, as it equates an opinion on content to the actual ability to alter/ban said content.

Are you talking about the cross or the tree?

Actually, you would be incorrect on both points.

Thought police were the 'thought police' because they actually could arrest you for what you thought.

Nope, doesn't work that way. Censorship is where you can force someone to alter their work against their own personal desires.

No, that's really not censorship. No one is canning their game, or forcing them to change anything, just a store refused to stock it.

True, but that doesn't mean you have to sell it on your storefront. There is a difference between selling something and acknowledging it's right to exist. Valve, mighty as they are, can't stop you from making whatever game you want.

That would require the stocking of games far, far more objectionable then this though, and would violate the freedom of a store to chose it's stock. It's not really a reasonable request.

So basically, you have to stock everything, because else someone who may want it won't be able to buy it from you, specifically? I can't think of a single retailer who could ever meet that requirement, as it removes their ability to pick and chose what they stock.

I'm not sure i'd support it ever, and not just on content grounds. It's a game made by honest to god neo-nazi types, which sticks you in a real world location, and encourages you to slaughter innocence just for fun. It's like buying a copy of 'birth of a nation' on blu-ray from the local KKK just to stick it to…

I wouldn't call in an occupy sort of angle, it was more a 'rage against the machine' sort of thing, with Red Jenny striking nobles the only way they could, in a world where commoners had little to no power.