Yeah, it’s way more likely that liberals would be angry about a show with 4 females leads than anti-woke chuds like you. /s
Yeah, it’s way more likely that liberals would be angry about a show with 4 females leads than anti-woke chuds like you. /s
if the Golden Girls aired today you’d call it identity-obsessed woke trash. rue mclanahan would mention her sexual agency and you’d start bleeding from your eyes
Pandering has been around for so long now that if you’re still irritated by it, then that’s pretty much your problem.
But fair.
Do it or shut the fuck up.
though I did vote for Hillary Clinton
It’s a pretty simple question. So black people are down. Okay, so you think they are inherently lesser.
Yes, that is the simplistic, childish, uncomplicated takeaway that conservatives hear when progressives talk about race, because you are incapable of engaging honestly with us.
But there’s a *lot* of humor in liberal self-righteousness, to be mined.
“Punching down” is attacking those with less privilege. And I get that you’re going to play dumb and act just completely shocked at the idea that privilege exists, and I’m the real racist, blah, blah, blah, we all know your shtick. But your absurd question has been answered.
That is extremely charitable to conservative comedy, and extremely uncharitable to actual practitioners of Juvenalian satire, not to mention Juvenal himself. What in God’s holy fuck does Greg Gutfield have in common with Jonathan Swift? What does Jeff Dunham have in common with Juvenal?
It does. Conservative humor—as in, the humor that appeals to a conservative—tends to be, as you might expect, conservative. Not politically conservative, but just generally, attitudinally conservative. You’re going to hear the same joke from the same guy multiple times, or at best endless variations on the same joke…
In short, nobody wins here.