Un-bee-lievable.

So many ppl in the bay area seem to be like that lately......

White guys in dreads surely do look stupid, but there is no excuse for her behavior, none. Especially once she starts assaulting him.

the original GN has a page count of 48. with everything that takes place in the story...the ONLY thing most people can talk about are a couple of panels...as if they happened in a vacuum.

riiiiight.... I made a joke. if I’d NEVER made a joke in an internet forum I’m certain NO ONE ELSE would have ever lost their collective shit about this.

again, I don’t spend time on reddit so I have no idea what you are talking about. there is a world outside the internet.

What? Since when are comics supposed to be “fun or edifying?” That’s like saying movies are supposed to be fun or edifying. Or games. Or television shows. Or music. Or books. Comics are a medium like any other. They aren’t “supposed” to be anything. They’re whatever the creators want them to be.

Nobody gives even 1/57th of a shit that you can't get in to see your retarded fake ass garbage show. Fuck off.

yes...please tell me how burying a couple of pages in a near 3 decades old graphic novel is going to right the wrongs against women?

OK, while the insinuation that a discussion about the way Barbara Gordon is treated in this comic (and the rest of the DC titles, really) is something bad that should be avoided *really pisses me off (because fuck you, people, women read comics and they have every right to talk about female characters and the…

Bless your heart, you’re in the wrong place. Tumblr’s this way.

I’ve been waiting for a straight adaptation of this story since 1989...and its being done by the best Batman team ever assembled.

Wu as well. Wu is a huuuuuuge fisher for this stuff. Even one of her former employess said she spent more time trolling the internet for mentions more than she did work.

Yeah, I was in favor of Anita’s Tropes vs. Women in Video Games until I saw it was full of manufactured controversy and backed with her own brand of perverse logic.

Chelsea Van Valkenburg, Anita Sarkeesian and John Flynt have all be caught multiple times fabricating harassment to reach whatever ends they were seeking. Raymond and Hepler are legit.

Well said, though I would take Anita Sarkeesian off that list. She went out and tried to pick fight for her own publicity/fame and it backlashed against her.

You mean after she was caught harassing people who were mad about the censorship? You don’t get to harass and then complain that you’re catching shit for it.

Part of the thing you need to do is be willing to not have a presence on the Internet. This means not running a personal twitter account and not having a Facebook or Google+ account that is accessible to the public. The less footprint you have the Internet, the more shielded you are from the public, which includes…

I’m going to be totally honest. When I read this, all I could think was this dude was thinking way too much about what was happening in strangers vaginas. I mean, thanks for helping a fellow human out, but that is some pre-planning that I can not wrap my mind around.

1. Things that have any impact on society