I think this sounds more interesting. Perma-permadeath is essentially a time bomb for the game; whatever player base you may acquire is inevitably and intentionally being cut down. And the harder you make the game the faster that group shrinks.

Thanks again for the conversation. I appreciate your time.

“He exists largely to tick a diversity box for marketing.”

I would go so far as to say it looks quite bad.

This bums me out. It makes me feel bad for all the people that really are victims of sexual assault.

Not at all.

This doesn’t look good for her, right?

It seems like there MAY have been a sexual assault, or maybe Jane Doe just decided that she’d have sex with Rose and his friends then cry rape later. For the sake of future rape victims, I hope this isn’t the case. But based on the text message that was leaked to Baller Alert, she absolutely comes off as a gold…

Ha ha ha!

Whatever the facts behind the story are, there is one undeniable fact alluded to in this article: 10 people, chosen from a pool of residents who live in a city who’s livelihood depends a lot on the University of Virginia, will decide whether to declare Rolling Stone Magazine intentionally lied, which ultimately cast a…

I disagree about the broader critic of “advocacy” journalism. I think it can play an important role, as long as its accurate with facts and clear about the author’s perspective.

Come on Rocksteady more Batman, or better yet tackle justice league. If you can make a good Batman game, prove you’re the best make a good Superman game.

Hopefully this will be the final nail in the “journalistic” coffin of both Beejoli Shah and Rolling Stone Magazine. Both represent festering boils on the rear-end of humanity.

Why did my comment about the author go from live to pending? I feel like several Beejoli Shah comments by usual commenters have been gray’d for some reason...

If an opinion piece/editorial wants to make such arguments, I think that is appropriate. But to package it as some kind of expose or in-depth reporting is a disservice to readers.

I read the Rolling Stone piece and kept waiting for a smoking gun, but then I realized that there wasn’t one and most of the article was simply the author’s opinion and preferences about how sports leagues should punish allegations of domestic violence and sexual assault.

Whatever happened to the original author of the UVA story?

I just read her “story” about Tarantino and can’t help but think “what a terrible person.” She tries to come across as a cool above-it-all person but is clearly a star-chaser who used someone else’s celebrity and sexual fetish as a vehicle to get her own self-promoting publicity.

Ugh. Beejoli Shah. Enough said.

Rolling Stone should maybe stick to writing about music for a while, Matt Taibbi, excepted.