There are already complaints of bias towards a particular manufacturer:

I took the first shot

I would love to see an F-22 in person. 2 decades old and still so god damn futuristic.

I believe it is unofficially officially being called technological fraud. Actually it is being lumped into the tech. fraud category that already exists (for not reaching bike weight minimums, bike dimension spec ranges, etc). The non-cycling media is basically who is calling it “mechanical doping.”

Acronym IMA, like “Ima let this bike finish climbing the hill by itself.”

Exactly. When Hesjedal was caught injecting stuff into his body to cheat, that was doping. When he was videoed with his bike squirming around on the pavement after a crash, that was him using a sneaky electric motor to cheat.

No kidding! I bet they’re doping their articles with a thesaurus!

We already have motorcycle racing.

“No, it was my FRIEND’S!!” That didn’t work when mom found your cigarettes when you were 14, and it doesn’t work in professional sporting events.

eh, its fresh compared to every analytical report of every aspect of the super bowl.

Motorized Doping, Explained: They put a motor in the bike.

Is “doping” now just cheating?

Third story on this in two days? You guys are really milking this.

I love that the NFL Experience is sitting in the middle of a rainy street next to half-demolished/refurbished Moscone Center

Sounds good, doesn’t that? Here’s the problem. The city’s hotels already were pretty full around this time for the past two years, so there can’t be too huge a bump. San Francisco magazine reported that hotels were 88 percent full in February 2015 and 90 percent full in February 2014.

Also, doesn’t San Fran have a hotel tax? Shouldn’t that make up at least some of the lost revenue?

As a San Franciscan, I just want to say that I don’t think there’s a better way for The City to spend its money than hosting a prestigious event on its 50th anniversary.

Those scorch marks on the side of the fuselage would seem to indicate otherwise.