moralltach
Moralltach
moralltach

Step 1) Humans think of something that robots are currently unable to do.

Why is everyone ok with the assumption that women have "astoundingly low self esteem"? Isn't that insulting?

Translation: I can't come up with a logical defense of my "100% not okay" accusation, so I'll just blame it on epistemological difference.

Ask Mrs. Ogre and see if she sees the jizz-imagery.

It's always funny to me that the people who see penises/jism symbolism everywhere are often not people who possess/produce them. I don't see it. I see a propellor and a parachute and a rocket and an arc made of milk.

The question of whether or not it's okay to solicit sex in exchange for services is absolutely irrelevant if it didn't happen. That's the point I'm making, which you have willfully ignored.

Given that the test was as much about visuals as anything, I'd say that's a fair consideration.

This took me five minutes. And I'm not saying it's fake, I'm just saying it wouldn't be hard to fake. You could just as easily create a real screenshot of a real message from a fake contact named whatever you want, a trick everyone I know has used since high school.

If you thought you knew basic physics and this balloon proved you wrong, you didn't know basic physics.

The vast majority of the content on Facebook is there because it was posted by the people you choose to hear from. If you don't want "faux-sentimental sludge from strangers" or "lukewarm acquaintances and friends' cousins' ex-boyfriends," REMOVE THEM. Anyone complaining about the content on Facebook has only

I know it's only 9:18 a.m., but I can confidently say this is the stupidest thing I'll read today.

Imagine, if you will, that astronomers have discovered a new kind of object in space that emits visible light. It's not an exploding ball of hydrogen like a star, nor is it nearly as big as any star we know, but it emits light — so heck, why not just call it a star? I mean, it looks a little bit like a star. And most

I don't think I'd call this racially insensitive. It's a terrible visual representation of the data, but that doesn't make it a racial problem. Like Field says, they clipped a graph to the shape of the US. Which is stupid. Not racist.

You know there's no correlation between lunar and menstrual cycles, right? Otherwise all women's cycles would be roughly aligned.

Doesn't this open a pretty huge loophole, legally? If you are accused of homosexuality, which is illegal, just say that you're not a man, you're trans, and thus not a homosexual. Seems like this renders the previous ruling unenforceable (not that that's a bad thing.)

Most of them are located near bodies of water for that reason. The heat of nuclear fission is used to heat water to boiling, and the steam drives turbines. In order to boil more water, that steam has to be cooled and condensed again, and most plants use a combination of cooling towers and liquid cooling (usually

But it's ok because he was probably running a red light or being self-righteous, right guys?

What if you're mad about something unrelated and your partner cites this article and says you should eat something, and then you get mad at them for avoiding the subject and just telling you to eat something? THEN WHAT?