I believe that's a wrestling dummy, so the fact that it's black is ostensibly coincidence. They didn't pick it for its color, they picked it for its ability to wear a shirt.

Again with this "outed" bullshit.

It's great that she's a) allowed to play and b) excited to play and c) not afraid to get hit, but she's also terrible. Marshawn Lynch, Steven Jackson, Frank Gore, etc. would have scored on that last one, even against NFL defenses.

I don't see how a law against identifying victims prevents reporting that a crime happened. "A man raped a woman at the corner of X and X" would not be a violation of the law as you've described it.

You still get interest on it though, right? Maybe I don't understand how EE bonds work.

So now "zero dollars" is worse than "more than zero dollars"?

They're unlabeled because I used the same colors and categories as their chart, and I didn't use numbers because the point was to show that the slices of corresponding colors are actually very close in share. Sorry if that was too tenuous a leap for you. And I also didn't think it was too much a stretch to use…

On the left is NY Fashion Week, on the right is US demographics. You may want to give a little context when you complain about underrepresentation.

I predict an article on Jez complaining about the casting decision, no matter who's chosen.

It seems like people have been doing "the first [something]" at the Winter X-Games every year for ten years. And I'm sure if you'd asked the medalists ten years ago if they could imagine doing what this year's guys do, they'd have said no, just as I'm sure the first guy to do a triple axel thought a quad would be…

Let's just get this straight:

It's not required, and there's a number of reasons he might not have one on here.

First of all, they're not celebrating their 50th anniversary. It's the 50th swimsuit issue, just like someone might celebrate the anniversary of their Fashion Week issue or Super Bowl issue or whatever. The magazine itself has been around for 60 years.

Thanks for clarifying that the Pornhub link is NSFW.

"He used to be a stupid chauvinist, but now, thanks to women, he's a nice person."

The looping on this gif makes it look like she's getting happier, only to be suddenly disappointed.

I completely garbled the headline in my mind and thought it was about a guy who retweeted one woman for a year. Which seemed like a really weird and stalker-esque thing to do.

I think the women he's retweeting are mostly journalists and bloggers who'd be using their real identities in order to associate it with their name. Profile pictures would help too.

How dare the zoo feed meat to lions? And cute meat at that! Someone should tell the obligate carnivores of the world that they're only allowed to eat ugly animals.

My first instinct was "you can't make a white laser," but this actually makes sense.