You're an angry person.

Well I'll be damned. I suppose my next question is whether it's ever been necessary to do so.

I have read those, actually. Missed the sarcasm, thought you were one of them. My mistake.

How is this any different than a shipping company buying its own trucks? It's vertical integration. If CBS had owned its own infrastructure, Time Warner couldn't have cut them off. This is alarming in exactly zero ways.

That's why they added another word in front of it. It makes it so it means a different thing. I could draw you a picture if you want.

I'm sure I'm going to regret this, but explain to me how sugar, the single uniting fuel of all organic life on this planet, is literal poison.

Hooray, a magnetic desk that'll ruin my wallet AND my computer!

I applaud you for being the exact opposite of the guy from Boston a few weeks ago who said we should all just "be fans of teams that can get their shit together." People move; loyalties don't.

I think it's fair to call it basic in terms of function. Since they hadn't quite nailed down a base number, it's not as useful, but it's the same idea and it's getting there.

Can we all take a moment to remember that Chris Collinsworth, without correcting himself, said that field goals above the goalposts cannot be challenged (which is true), but then continued on to say that field goals below the top of the posts can be? No correction, no hesitation.

I like Siciliano a lot, both as a Red Zone guy and in his other segments on the NFL Network. I was most struck by his professionalism during the Hernandez thing, when he was first accused/arrested and they kept emphasizing that they refused to speculate and giving very detailed information on what they did know.

Does anyone actually search for porn? I've never in my life gone into a search engine and looked up "_____ porn."

Not quite. Our commissioner juiced the defense a little bit to play more of a part in the matchup, the way a real defense does, so mine (CHI) got 20 instead of 11 by standard scoring. Still.

"The" article calling Adam Levine a douche? There have been six, the most recent of them today. This was not a fleeting topic.

I know it's considered very poor form to talk about one's own fantasy team, but I'm sorry, I will never stop gloating over this one.

Or don't mark your calendars if you're just going to whine about it.

I find it disrespectful that the author would put so little effort into research, and I also find it disrespectful that you called Graydon disrespectful over a little innocuous (and accurate) sarcasm. No doubt you will find this response equally disrespectful.

Ditto. But were I to assume, stupidly, that the tone of the articles on this site is representative of the majority, you and I would not be in it.

I cannot wait to see how the Jezebels of the world try to blame society for the inner workings of boobs.

You lost me at "electronic system that never fails."