moosecommander
MooseCommander
moosecommander

Have you played all of the games through completely? While I would agree with the core of the argument, each game has managed to have a great story, and this ties the franchise together well. I agree - we need some more variation. They said this is the end of the "Ezio trilogy" so hopefully we'll see some expansion

Yeah, that's actually what I was thinking about when I wrote that :)

You're correct, although the paranoid fear here would be "What if Apple decides I can't have that music anymore?" Obviously no one will come into your house and delete your music, but its possible Apple could delete files off your hard drive through iTunes if you gave the program access and if Apple were total

Is there any reason to really doubt Valve at this point? They've continually made some of the highest qualities games ever. There isn't one blemish I can name on their track record.

That's not entirely true.

GTA and Red Dead have all had fast travel via various systems, from taxi cabs to setting up camp and then mysteriously teleporting to your destination.

Police are willing to drop smaller charges if it means someone worse can end up behind bars. They would gladly arrest a murderer rather than someone who drove drunk any day. Luckily our law enforcement is able to remain at least somewhat judgmental and rational. This technique has been used against the mob a lot,

It made very, very little money.

Yes, yes it was.

But you could make that argument about any of the games I listed (well, for the most part, at least). In Gears of War you could replay the section with different weapons and take a slightly different path.

They didn't write Iron Man 2. They only wrote the original.

It isn't that people dislike linear games, its that bad linear games get picked on specifically for being linear.

Who complains about a free remodel? That's a damn nice new window right there.

Well, you changed it from being about "reveling in his death," to "sensationalizing the topic of bin Laden's death," which are pretty different things if you "read between the lines" as you have asked me to do. There's a huge difference between taking advantage of the timeliness of a popular news story and

In the end, its somewhat hard to not blame Sony. They had OtherOS, they took it away, etc. What were they thinking?

Each time I've responded you've back stepped in some way to pick on something different. That's fine, but I can't waste my time replying to you when your argument is changing. First you said the article itself was about reveling in the gorey death of bin Laden, which isn't true, because the article itself is in no

I'm well aware of the difference between the two, and I apologize, as you are right in that case. But my point overall doesn't change.

Well, see, that's a valid question. I guess you could say bullets and guns are sort of gadgets, in a way. It depends on how broad your definition is. Gizmodo is a blog about gadget news but, more importantly, also about how we interact with gadgets and how they influence our lives.

This isn't "reveling" in the cause of the death. Its an interesting scientific breakdown of something we constantly see in movies and hear about in current events, in this case, the death of bin Laden. That doesn't make it any less interesting to know how such an action actually occurs within the body.

Hmm, interesting point. It seems that Portal 2 would be a title that gets traded in by most fairly quickly