No one said anything about negating the bad. I really suggest that you learn to read. You have to take account both the good and the bad. The fact you can even equate a religion to Hitler or Stalin shows your ignorance.

Oh there's a big difference between good satire and bad satire. You, on the other hand, clearly have no clue. So in short, fuck off.

We are not hell bent on hating Muslims

Of course I have read the "holy books". There's good parts and bad parts. You seem to paint all religions with the same broad brushstroke by stating only the bad parts. It's just as disgusting as the fanatics that paint their religion by stating only the good parts.

The fact you can think a crap cartoon can be a "clear statement against ignorance, intolerance and hate" is quite telling. You can call it what you want, as I said before, but it's crap.

The fact that you would say that a religion is "absolutely disgusting" is.. well, absolutely disgusting.

You don't get it, do you?

Sorry dude, if you can't see how this cartoon is crap, then there's really no reasoning with you. CH does not make any valid point that will actually challenge established positions. It does one thing only - offend people to gain publicity. Much like how we have Ann Coulter here in the US. You can keep on "defending"…

Saw this already when it first came out. What's the point?

As a Muslim, allow me to shed some light onto why Muslims don't like photos of our prophet(pbuh). Pictures of a person easily allows them to be idolized. I don't even mean idolized as in direct worshiping, but even 'idolizing' as in a celebrity, or even a picture of Jesus(it is actually ironic how the word idol has…

CH is not progressive. It's just offensive masked as progressive as a way to excuse their poor taste in cartoons. It's crap before the attacks, and now someone because of the tragedy, it turned into a symbol. But let's face it. CH is crap.

Here's my summary of the conflict:

But those caricatures do not only hurt the crazy, murderous ones. They also attack the normal, mundane Muslims who may expressed they are annoyed by this, but won't hurt anyone. Why are they an acceptable target?

The people of Charlie Hebdo definitely didn't deserve what happened, but this isn't an issue of free speech, its an issue of actions have consequences. Far too often people will talk out of line, say something or do something that reflects poorly on them, and then they try to use "free speech" as a Get Out of Trouble…

A cat is not fine too?

First, it's Junya Watanabe. If you are familiar with his style, then it makes sense. High fashion is not ready-to-wear.

Lol, it's just as I predicted when the first trailers came out.