monkeycrackers2
monkeycrackers2
monkeycrackers2

"Megatron toy that transforms into a B2 bomber" so in other words NOT the best thing from the 1980s... the colors are more Galvatron too anyway.

Ooops, I must have mild dyslexia... I thought they were announcing a companion for the Galaxy Gear, but for your waist instead of wrist XD

No, Apple never said they never gave out data. They in fact said they did comply with some requests, while denying other requests that they felt were not right. And PRISM is not the same as government information requests.

It's intended for medical professionals to be able to monitor and check on your device without having to crack you open again.

Except crappy tech can have the opposite effect, killing people's interest in it. Remember all the crappy "smart"phones and tablets that were out before? Nobody had any interest until it was actually done right.

The setup by the article was disappointing... for a "grisly tale of violent revenge", there wasn't much revenge... like advertising a murder mystery that ends before the murder...

I was thinking Army of Darkness and it gave me Wizard of Oz :D

So I guess Mario didn't even watch the videos? In the third one, at the 1:18 mark:

One big factor is the cost. Dropping a bomb (in the tens of thousands) is a lot cheaper than firing a missile (in the hundreds of thousands to over a million).

What about the brave souls who have to clean Windows PCs? Viruses and porn... on your parents' computer! Or discovering that your step brother's kinks are of the tentacular kind :S

I hate to be a grammar Nazi (okay, I don't)... but you keep switching between "was" and "were". As a writer you should probably learn when to use which word... or at least stick to one or the other.

Also: "an animal might hid away in the ground" and "There's a something specific"...


X-Men 2 and 3. Though I didn't mind Dark Phoenix not being cosmic; that would have been way too grand and had too many characters that would either need to be introduced or be left out.

That's not the Quinjet!

That's a prototype iPhone picture from years ago. They were unearthed during the Samsung vs Apple trial. The picture's just to show that Apple's been thinking about curved glass on products for a while, which is what's rumored for the iWatch. This Giz post just fails to mention any of those points. Though in fairness

At this point in time, no you can't make money with a store. Just to print one back panel will probably take 30-60 minutes, and costs $1-2 in material, not counting the cost of the machine. And the quality is rough, not good for something you're always holding like phones. For the higher resolution printers with a