Again, you know damn well what he meant: That refusing to move past American slavery and remaining a constant victim is a choice. He was right. There isn’t a shrink in the world who would tell you to live in the past.

Way to dodge the question. You know Goddamn well the white and black progressives think he’s a house nigger. Why you would tolerate a movement who condemns someone’s ideas based on their race is beyond me. It’s one thing to think he’s a joke; it’s another to find him a race traitor. Just ask The Root.

Do you agree with comments that he is an Uncle Tom because of said 1st Amendment protected dumbassery.

Das right. Think of it, the progressive left are now telling black people how to think. You support this fucking shit?

Right, I’m sure he’ll be removed with the GOP in power. You have no idea how people look at the left from outside your cocoon right now.. The left have transgressed badly here.

We’ll see, baby. We’ll see. BwahahahahahahahahHah.

I look forward to the perjury charges against him, then.

Again: If we do not honor the PRINCIPLE of presumed innocence in this confirmation, then ALL FUTURE POLITICAL CONFIRMATION PROCESSES WILL BE DERAILED. Can you stop and think about the consequences of this for one Goddamn second? What will happen when the left (eventually) get to nominate ANYONE?

Citation still needed. He said he drank too much. And as for the “he knew about Ramirez ‘s allegations prior to the New Yorker”, that is already debunked. He knew she was looking for dirt, his buddies told him, but didn’t know what the actual allegation was. He testified as such.

Holy balls, you people are insane. Think of it, you have now abandoned the presumption of innocence and call it an MRA ideal. Do you even understand what you’re saying? You are actively against one of the foundational principles of the West.

Wow, you're sublingual. Thanks for the smut, sugartaint! I'll crank one out to it later.

In related news, academics just demolished gender studies/feminist critics theory journals by getting the most preposterous articles imaginable published.

It is absolutely ridiculous to believe that a judge is not a human being. It is preposterous to believe that being accused of gang rape and presiding over a case on it’s legal merits are the same situation. Nice Kafkatrap you’ve set up there: Accused someone of gang rape, then if they’re found innocent, dismiss them…

Still got paid, you Salem witch trial looking motherfucker. Oh, and I MUST have skeletons to defend presumption of innocence, right? You sound like Donald Rumsfeld.

The only reason? The primary reason is that it they can take it from one person, they can take it from me. What part of this do you not understand?And there’s the little thing out being a foundational principle of the West. What your suggesting is the way the Cultural Revolution ooerated, FFS. And please don’t tell me…

Hey guys, Ford just got caught dead to rights lying under oath. Her ex said he witnessed her giving tips to pass the polygraph, Ford testified she had never done this. Meanwhile, the Kavanaugh texts “bombshell” proves Jack Fuck. It’s over. I am absolutely thrilled the progressives are fucked. The only thing more…

Hey guys, Ford just got caught dead to rights lying under oath. Her ex said he witnessed her giving tips to pass the polygraph, Ford testified she had never done this. Meanwhile, the Kavanaugh texts “bombshell” proves Jack Fuck. It’s over. I am absolutely thrilled the progressives are fucked. The only thing more…

Citation needed. 

So an accusation proves guilt.

Blah blah blah. None of the shit you’re bitching about has a Goddamn thing with fucking with the presumption of innocence. You'd have to be a fucking fool to argue that because of historical injustice we’re going to give up a foundational principle of the West. Your laundry list of shit nobody can change does not…