Well, yes, it is an absolutely horrific time to be a proponent of the presumption of innocence. It’s like a Shoah for people who believe in due process and democracy and shit.
Well, yes, it is an absolutely horrific time to be a proponent of the presumption of innocence. It’s like a Shoah for people who believe in due process and democracy and shit.
“Credibly.” Key word right there.
You talk about straight white men the way the alt right talk about Jews. I wish all you identitarians would fuck off to an island and have a knife fightso the rest of us could go back to treating people like individuals, you illiberal twat.
You mean the privilege of the presumption of innocence? Yes, that is dropping precipitously, and you idiots are kicking it down the stairs.
Is this your attempt at retardation?
BREAKING NEWS, WOMEN FOUND TO BE HUMAN BEINGS.
Fuck off, you racist faggot.
So you want extrajudicial punishment dished out by the mob against a man against whom no complaints were filed.
Hey fucko. Look at the shit you people have unleashed.
And...you attack his RACE and gender while championing his depersoning. I cannot wait for the liberals to rise up and bury you fucking illiberal progressive fucks. You have destroyed the left. Go felch yourself, you bigot cunt regressive racist retard.
Word. And I have nothing against the investigation, however likely this was a politically-timed phenomenon. But because of this timing and the very unexamined and currently actively opposed idea of the presumption of innocence, there is no way the results will satisfy the progressives. They will never accept the…
Damn good analogy. It’s almost interesting to watch people throw off their principles and go against liberal ideas as they get caught up in this restorative “justice” movement. I think most thinking people with some sense of self-preservation would loudly decry collective guilt. That road leads to conflict,…
How to get this job? Work in law. And I mentioned Obama as I was furious over Garland and I’m furious now. If you aren’t, you have, whaddaya call it, situational ethics. Cough cough hypocrisy.
Nope. They didn’t even press charges. This is the progressive morality cops saying he shouldn’t be allowed to perform on their behalf. They straight up say the Cellar shouldn't host him. They want him depersoned, which means redemption is impossible.
Without redemption, we have no future. Ryan made clear there is no redemption. You say it must meet some standard, but CK hasn’t reached it. He never will. That’s the way it is now.
You want him depersoned. No redemption, no forgiveness. He came clean, asked forgiveness. Should he be allowed electricity? A phone? Should he have his face disfigured? What about Asia Orgento? Will she be able to work again? I thought progressive preacher rehabilitation?
Check this out. A glimpse of the consequences: Professor may be fired for saying accusers sometimes lie.
So are you comfortable calling me an amoral hypocrite for defending the presumption of innocence, regardless of who is involved? Remember, I voted Obama twice.
Fucking bingo. Hashtag activism is the devil.
I’m not asking for them to act on principle out of some false sense of empty morality. I agree about Garland, but if we do this to the presumption of innocence, the consequences will be catastrophic. Everyone who can be accused --meaning everyone --will be accused. It's so shortsighted that's it's seriously…