Because do you know who is the real victim here? The rapists. Why doesn’t anyone ever think of the poor rapists?

Sigh, please fix it.

Typo alert: I’m pretty sure it’s the National Enquirer, not the National Inquirer.

Also, please ungray me. Like, please. Any day now. I’ve only been a good commenter since before the great transition.

They were very strict with their ingredients prior to the sale. Everything had to be food grade, for example.

I met Burt, their original beekeeper, years ago, before he died (obviously), and before the original owner sold the company. I have his signature and a message to me on a t shirt with a picture of him on his motorcycle.

Here’s proof that it’s not evidence of fraud: http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/the-conversation/sd-california-more-voters-than-eligible-adults-claim-20170809-htmlstory.html

He did and it was brilliant.

She also did an incredible interview with Marc Maron on WTF in which she really opened up about herself. They have an incredible rapport. She’s a phenomenal interviewer about people’s artistic lives, and he’s completely untraditional and can get people to examine and reveal their personal lives.

Always a fan of Barf Bag, but I noticed a typo: “Listening to Sebastian Gorka tell Fox News that the“President’s Twitter feed” can compel China to act on North Kora is in no way reassuring.”

Good article, but just wanted to say there are two typos I noticed. Deiced instead of decided, and part instead of party.

According to the NYT coverage of Mooch leaving, he was hired based on Ivana Trump and Jared Kushner’s recommendation to drive out Preibus. Preibus is one of the last connections to the traditional RNC. There’s one more big one - Jeff Sessions.

http://www.tmz.com/2016/08/30/chris-brown-weapons-drugs-seized-gun-assault/

They’re still continuing W. Kamau Bell’s show United Shades of America. I am sure he has said worse, especially on his Politically Reactive podcast.

They actually gave the nanny custody, which is unusually drastic.

I love you, but this sentence doesn’t make sense. Did the judge flee the country?

Thank you.

I am not seeing how people are pretending that there isn’t a choice involved. Ever. But, I see you arguing the point quite vociferously as if that somehow adds to the conversation. I don’t find the belaboring the fact that people do choose do take a drug that is illegal adds anything to the conversation other than…

If it’s incredibly cruel and shortsighted, why is it one you are championing?

Wait, you mean “just say no” doesn’t work? *clutches pearls*

So is jumping to simplistic nonanswers. Just don’t do it doesn’t address the people who are already addicted. You can go support “just say no” programs while the rest of us try to figure out what to do with the people who are already addicted, and are being prosecuted at unfair ratios due to their race.