I believe Woody did it, that said - Jesus H, could these kids have had worse luck/parenting/whatever. You don't adopt more than one kid at a time - not unless you're doing sibs. (Yes, I have adopted.) 2 kids in 92, 2 in 94? And that's a good idea? And this family is a like one red flag after another to a social…

This article is treating the whole thing like a tabloid scandal and doing the utmost to make this about Mia Farrow, even if that means dragging her children through the muck. It seems very unnecessary to me.

The following quote (regarding Soon Yi) doesn't make any sense and should be corrected. "(The history of Soon-Yi's biological mother as a prostitute is as pointed as it is confusing. According to Mia, Soon-Yi was found eating out of garbage cans on the streets and spoke "no known language, only gibberish." How then,…

This article is so clearly slanted in Woody's favor. It is kind of ridiculous.

Agreed. Particularly violating was the revelation of the current names. Previously I've always heard their children referred to by their childhood names, affording them anonymity (if desired) in adulthood.

As a mother of three young adult children, I can say unequivocally that there is nothing any of them could do that would make me say they are "dead to me," and disown them. My oldest son is a recovering heroin addict so I've been tested plenty.

Exactly. He was coparenting with Mia throughout Soon Yi's childhood. You don't just *boom* look at her on her 18th birthday and suddenly find her attractive. This would not have happened without grooming.

I'm utterly baffled as to this article's agenda. Particularly as I'm fairly certain a previous article made it clear that none of this was relevant.

Much like if we all had 14 kids, the first 10 kids get full paragraphs and all of our attention, but the last four get 2 left over sentences.

I'm not particularly sure what the purpose of this is. Is this another "Mia Farrow is a crazy child collector" article? Cause it seems pretty heavy on criticizing Mia.

Jezebel, cease and desist. I'm not going to click this link, and it is not right to publish and mock an artist's interview. He did his best and did not make it and we should leave it at that. How would you feel about your worst job interviews posted online and mocked by others?

Alternative title: "Jezebel Posts Click-Baity Headline to Shame Someone Who Has Apparently Done Nothing to Deserve Shaming".

See, this is what I hate about celebrity and sites like Jezebel sometimes.

It makes me uncomfortable that this has been uploaded for us to laugh at. He's not great but he tried for something. I'm not sure pointing and laughing is a good use of our time. Not to mention that this was YEARS ago.

Given that Jezebel includes many stories about the lack of women and/or women of color being represented in various arenas, I sincerely hope that people realize that Tyra's point is completely valid. Even though she is thin and tall she is still dark and curvy and that opened up what it meant to be a super model (yes…

Why is George Clooney on this cover? Did he do anything this year?

Still not front and center enough. Can't get enough of Lupita.

I thought this show was fine, but nothing memorable. He's a talented guy, but it didn't feel special enough for the situation.

Nothing says in touch with the youths of 2014 like a 38 year old man at a lingerie pool party.

I hate American Apparel, but this is pretty incredible. I love that they did this.