molly-fied
Molly-fied
molly-fied

I don't know why Leo's testifying on climate change either. It's an absurdity.

I do get what you mean, but I think the celebrities best help by bringing in people who would otherwise not be exposed and that the testimony should be from the people who are doing the actual work in the campaign and probably won't get 1/10th the recognition. Same thing with Leo or Ben Affleck, they have no business

You're joking right?

Something about the use of rich white completely unqualified actors/actresses to testify at and spearhead these sorts of things doesn't sit fabulously well with me. They are not experts, they have done nothing noteworthy in the service of the cause they now "champion"....

If they have a twitter or facebook post something about it (tagging them). Customer service sometimes really improves when other people can see what they're doing (esp. if this is a commn problem).

There you're very wrong. You might as well use your full name and post your SIN given the amount of info you make available just on this site. If you were a 12 year old I'd give you the internet talk and hope you grow out of it.

Uh... sure? My point was calling all people who use reddit sniveling manchildren who hate women (or whatever the accusation was) because of /r/fapping is about as sane as calling all people who read gawker media misogynists because we have some shitting commentators (and jez posted the links to pictures too).

Great so you fund the systematic oppression of Canada's aboriginals instead. Real saint.

So you're going to stop paying taxes to the US government right?

I am, and know quite a few ladies who also go to reddit to look at cat pictures and read really good summaries of science news and find interesting documentaries and read feminist subreddits and locate cool craft projects or nifty places to take a vacation or talk about the intricacies of photography. Reddit is a

laser beams= beams of coherent light

... see at first I thought you were joking, cause I totes was. But now I think you're serious, and that's actually a pretty shitty way to think, not funny in the slightest?

Hear hear!

I assume you're also a fan of Harper. Because with so much evil packed into your comment there's no way that you're not. Shame on you and your tastebuds.

Not much TV, no children, very detailed calendar. I find it pretty easy, but I suppose if you wanted like 4 or 5 partners you're gonna run out of time at some point.

Ok, so let's use a metaphor (you understand the concept of metaphors right?)

Ok, you've proven you can't read. So I'll try it really slowly:

Lashing out at you? I called you a liar because you lied: i.e. children cannot legally give consent so pedophilia is by the DSM5's definition a paraphilic condition. This says nothing about dominance or a wish to control. Either you can't read or are willfully misrepresenting the facts.

People worry about the darndest things. (Both SO and I kept our names and we get all the questions about it. I dig ya.)

There is no empirical basis to your assumption that pedophilia is about dominance as opposed to what research indicates (neurological differences). So your baseless speculation is not only harmful to the people who are trying to get help, but harmful to the children that stand in the path of those who won't be