moldy912
moldy912
moldy912

IT'S A TRAP!

@Manly McBeeferton: That is literally the funniest thing I've seen in the past three days. Thanks!

@pen.suhl: A bunch of words: watch the video of Avatar Kinect of Ballmer talking. You'll see that it does fully body movement including the face and fingers. Now obviously Avatar Kinect will be a sit down environment, but the fingers could definitely be in the release or in the Kinect update that is supposed quadruple

Two words: middle finger.

@Coreboy: Just saw one for $230 lol.

@destryer: You also have to think about the succession of TV formats and the time it takes them to become commercially wide-spread and affordable. It takes time and manufacturers know that. It's not like they are pumping out 500k of these every year...yet.

@gsnorby: Um, there's a problem with your thinking. The "best" sets usually have all of the new features, whether they are unanimously awesome or not. 3D is new, therefore you will see it in all high end TVs from now on. You may even see it trickle into your midranges this year. BTW, it's not a big waste of money if

I guess women have something going for them; they can't be jackasses.

Ok guys, remember, this game is built for you to buy DLC. First off, it's only $50 so if you were ok with paying $60, then you can use the extra cash on DLC, which will undoubtedly have some cars we all know are missing. Also, if I remember correctly, Atari's pricing with the DLC is fairly appealing. Something like 8

@deathvanquished: I think it's supposed to be in an update, but don't be surprised to pay for it (I'm not sure if it will be free or not). They delayed it because they wanted to get the handling/physics of the bikes right.

@Imagine: You have to take into consideration what extra features it might have. If it has a bunch of new Mac specific modes, then it could be worth it. If it's just higher resolution on a bigger screen, then sure it could be a rip off.

@Coreboy: I think you might have misread what I said. I meant I have seen an app for $99, as in ninety-nine dollars (!)

@redplasticsoul: I like your analogies, and they help your argument very well. I agree that the blame is on everyone involved, but the bigger problem is the person downloading. If they are satisfied with a product, they should pay for it after trying it. If they have researched it enough that they are sure they will

@redplasticsoul: I can assure you most people who seed files on torrent websites and crack things all for piracy usually end with a nice statement: "If you like it, BUY IT." So, even though they are allowing others to get it for free, they still want it to be used as a demo/trial without limitations. It's the

@lordmorgul: Another thing is that smart consumers can use the Mac App Store to find apps, visit the developer's website, and buy it there so 100% goes to the developer.

@Whitson Gordon: I could be wrong. I'll check again later. I do remember seeing Garageband though.

@Christo Acosta: Yes, it says a lot of my apps are already installed, such as Garageband, iWork, etc.

@Whitson Gordon: I did too. Make sure you are logged in with your Apple ID. Even though it is free, you have to be logged in. Once I logged in, it worked fine.

@jglavin: Yeah, I've noticed them too. Apple announced this a while ago so maybe it got past the filters or whatever. Anitesh.jaswal, it's not that big of a deal though, the app store includes a link to the developers' websites.