They should call it the CT8 at that point. A 6 just doesn’t connote “top of the line” in the luxury segment.
They should call it the CT8 at that point. A 6 just doesn’t connote “top of the line” in the luxury segment.
Ouch.
Dennis Palatov has been proving that model quite well. Engine in the passenger position: http://www.palatov.com/cars/d1/
Except when he hands Putin exactly what he wants for free:
I was honestly unclear with my post ;) My point was that race cars and track cars are much cheaper, faster, and more fun on track than any of these supercars.
The bit about F1 cars comes from these ridiculous track-only hypercars. Ferrari and McLaren have sold the illusion that their cars are the ultimate driving…
That was the joke. Not saying it was a good joke, but it was a comment made with full knowledge of everything you wrote out.
Race cars are always better than supercars at the race track.
What are you doing on here with those legitimate questions?
People won’t mind them on a Porsche. The only real reason they whined was because they didn’t like Lexus/Toyota.
Last time I did donuts, I felt like I was just abusing the car (and the tires) for no good reason. Didn’t last long.
Yeah - that number is now done.
I’m not going to argue that the Chiron is a track car, but they had definitely eased off when they let the Panamera (and GT3) go by.
I was thinking the same thing, but with less specificity. The One-77 was seriously tuned and it had 750 hp. Something is not right here.
Thank you. It’s a huge improvement.
That was some wicked shifting. Bruce Lee speed.
I was wondering if Graverobber was going for record CP.
Tomorrow’s article:
My brother has an NSX. It is not *that* cheap to run. Clutch replacement is exotic-car expensive, and a lot of the custom hardware, like the door window motors, are way expensive (and die with some regularity). It is cheaper to run than a Ferrari, but I doubt it is any cheaper than a Cayman.
<3000 lb., mid-engine six cylinder with amazing handling and a great looking aluminum body?