mnford--disqus
mnford
mnford--disqus

Although this week wasn't the Mon-El hour in terms of screen time, it grates on me that the only conversation (that I recall) between Alex and Kara was about how Alex thought Kara should forgive Mon-El.
The fact that, even if Kara went over the top with her reaction to his lie, Alex's response was to tell her to go to

This may be a double post because it's held up as spam for some reason. Sorry for that.

Also, apparently Raven got the good and bad parts of having her brain enchanced (seizures and more knowledge/power), while Abby only got the visions… maybe she got premonitory powers? Either way, possibly she'll get the knowledge of how to create nightblood when it's more convenient. If she doesn't it probably will be

So much this. And to make it worse, in previous seasons (actually, S1-2), when someone had issues with Clarke at least she defended her position and as -like you said- everyone had their especific POV, it usually resulted in a dialogue between two nuanced positions that didn't usually get 100% resolved (hence the grey

Well, she's in charge publicly but all they've done so far has been following Raven's insctructions, including going for the ''water machine'' that was Monty's suggestion and the infamous list, that was Raven's.

It bothered me that Monty was in on it, though. He was understandably upset when Jasper was wasting water but saw no problem doing something that would force Clarke to waste some more. Or now that they only have to worry about 100 saving water is no longer a problem? Though now they have a lake on the backyard, so why

I think that's what they were going for, but Clarke's problem here is that Monty threw her under the bus leaving her in a poor position to explain herself. Clarke's plan was still better than the solution Jaha proposed -which he only did to save a complicated situation. In fact, had Jaha been the one to make the

I used to give this show a lot of credit in S1-2, but since S3 I wonder whether it was just a fluke. They created more or less credible situations that genuinely didn't have a good solution, but it could be that I remember them more fondly than I should or that by repetition they cease to be as interesting or morally

I expect Jasper to not be in it, but the show conveniently skipped why Bellamy should be in even when he was willing to stay. Of course Clarke would put his name, but he seemed sure he wouldn't be.

After thinking about it, it is possible that Abby doesn't know about the plan, so she doesn't have to get why treating them was a waste even if they survived (why doesn't she know if Jaha does?). But the show totally framed Raven to be in the wrong even though from her perspective (and she has the big picture

Unles they are in a situation where they could actually kill them -and by them I mean Bellamy.

I thought this too. Even in episode 2 they had the three of them in one shot with Raven and Clarke thinking about how to proceed with Bellamy's choice, while he was inthe backround looking kindof lost and unable to focus on the discussion. This may be reaching a bit, since it was my perception at first watch, but it

Why are you changing the theme of what I was saying if you are replying to me? My question was clear: what has Bellamy aported other than being a soldier to warrant everyone's loyalty? especially after S3, but let's not forget S1.
Lexa was Heda, it's not like any Skaikru could say 'We don't like her, change your

I don't think he/she is… even Jaha understands more what Clarke has done than Bellamy. Just this episode he had to give Bellamy a different monologue because he didn't fit the 'the leaders don't want to end up killing their people' one. Instead, he got the '…uhm, at least you thought you were right?'.

Very well articulated, but I actually agreed with Raven. Why use the medication when probably you are not going to leave some arkadian out of the station so that the child (if she survived) could have that place? The choice seemed so clear that I had a hard time believing Abby would even consider it herself, and an

But with this analogy, if the one you have to keep in a leash misbehaves, how do you make him understand his mistakes if he isn't capable of it himself? And like PIke last season -when it seemed like all of a sudden they couldn't survive without his help and so had to let him live until the finale (although they

Totally agree. And if we take S3 at face value, we can either read him as incredibly selfish or incredibly shortsighted. I don't see how he is still trusted by Clarke, Raven, Kane… no one should trust him to make any kind of decision, like it was proved last episode.

I don't have a problem with actions done during war, if the show wanted to be realistic it would be a mess trying to hold every character accountable for what they did and whether it was justified and whatnot.

The thing they should be acknowledging is that it was a stupid and suicidal decision, and go from there having Bellamy lose the trust of the arkadians. Then we could have him actually learning about strategy and doing what is 'objectively' the best for your people, not only what you are feeling like at the moment.

I can see this, but she has never been ''officially'' in charge of anything other than the 100. The arkers didn't vote for her, so it becomes this in-between situation where people whine about her without recognising she is leading when she doesn't have an obligation to do so, and at the same time no one offers an