oh yay... more Michael Burnham. The most shoe-horned-into-a-franchise-lead-character-ever. Why should I care about this character or vision of ST? Because Spock’s her “brother” ? Because she’s got mommy issues? Picard had family issues in TNG as Did Riker w/his dad, then later his doppelganger, Worf, Sisko, and of…

Spot on. 

Every day regardless of reality is a slow news day here in Japan.

Garak was an excellent character

From Aksum Empire (with a Solomonic ancient lineage and trade power), to Mali (which had a very democratic system- ripe with intrigue) to Benin to North African Moorish Raiders and Ghanaian gold kings— the Middle Ages of Africa do offer a lot of rich opportunities. It s a whole continent of potential and awe…

Hm, I didn’t mind Michael’ push on the tardigrade— I felt like it was one of the truer to ST moments thus far in the series, holding to a open minded this altering perspective to find a solution is pretty base to the model. But I really don’t like the crew conflicts, it’s really too far from the nature Star Trek. I’m…

I kinda agree. It’s better than It being Ozymandias. The tech and the motivation fits better— I’m if the age that the Watchmen universe is best left contained in the Moore series and done, and worse than spun off to sub series— ( which include Travis Dickle) — it should never become tangiably crossed over with any…

Wow, that is so simple- starch and sauce, yet somehow so very wrong. It gives me the creeps,you are bad and yet awesome for this answer. It strikes a chord with me.