You’ve been a small child for 37 years and you think the KKK signs are weird?
You’ve been a small child for 37 years and you think the KKK signs are weird?
“For any knowledgable baseball fan, that’s basically irrelevant and easy to ignore, but for newcomers to the game, it can raise concerns. Last year, during Game 7 of an instantly legendary World Series, the triple-K was displayed, and people somewhat understandably moaned.”
Yeah what the hell is the deal with the ending paragraph?! Don’t hedge your bets on this one. It’s fine, it will always be fine. Context is your friend. Seeing three K’s in the K corner doesn’t advocate white supremacy.
Yeah, it’s a goofy looking thing that I’m sure is confusing if you don’t understand it, but her immediate incredulousness is hilarious to me. Like, did she really think at a major league baseball stadium during a major league baseball game there was just a sign for the Ku Klux Klan? Did she think the fifth inning…
When you become outraged at everything, you are outraged at nothing.
The sheer randomness of their inception, though, means it would be totally fine if we one day decided to change them, too.
This is the world we inhabit. We’ve gotten to the point where the headline “K Corners aren’t racist” isn’t satirical.
Agree here. Gun laws that make you safer have been in place for decades. Mainly background checks. Everything else, from all out weapon bans to magazine restrictions dont actually make anyone safer, but they have that false “feel good” sensation with them.
What we need is an improved psychological care system, and to…
Counterpoint: Proposition 63 was yet another in the now acknowledged-to-have-failed efforts—like the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban—to legislate against things that look scary to people with no exposure to or knowledge of firearms...but have virtually no impact on making the public safer.
Since my questions became collateral damage, I’ll respond to your OP:
“Warren is an expert in bankruptcy law; this gives her a vision for our nation’s future.” P.J. O’Rourke.
Is that you, Progressive Liberal?
She would get beaten by men’s college players.
He exaggerated on the 700th bit. But isn’t the rest of it true? Can’t we both acknowledge that she’s unprecedentedly awesome and amazing AND that she’d get crushed by someone like Novak D or Andy Murray? She’d presumably admit as much herself if you forced her to answer. Those guys are taller than her, faster than…
“I believe their first suspending and then firing her was directly because of her appearing on the Tucker Carlson TV show, and is a violation of her federal and state constitutional rights to free speech,” Farber said.
This may be true for YOU and YOUR political views, but there are plenty of people out there who aren’t on the fringes of politics and prefer a more centrist, moderate approach. There is nothing wrong with wanting, say, pro-choice rights for women, marriage equality, AND lower taxes and smaller government.
i think this is super interesting. i know the recovery community as a whole isnt that interested in medical marijuana (and as someone who was addicted to weed for a long time i dont see myself using it again unless something really extreme happens) but the numbers are there and are kind of being ignored.
Nah, it’s fucking awesome you liberal pussy.
The black jurors are the reason they didn’t get justice. The white men and women weren’t the ones thinking he was innocent. So if they want justice no black people should be allowed on the jury. All white jury and we will get a guilty plea.
Are you talking about obamacare?