mjohnson27401
Mike Johnson
mjohnson27401

No, you don’t get to tell me what I can and can’t do in a free country as long as I’m abiding by the law and not taking away the rights of others. As soon as I violate either of those things then society gets to impose restrictions and punishments. Along with that comes the concept of “limited government” They are

“Because the way I see it, who says I want or need to know you think i’m pretty? Who are you and why do you think I want you to interupt my work to say this to me? That’s not cool. No matter what you or they may have intended, it’s insulting” - Western Feminism in a neat little paragraph.

Think of how much better off everyone would be if women would just stay home and raise kids. Better families, none of this workplace harassment....what a wonderful world it would be.

As another poster pointed out. The firing efficiency of weapons hasn’t appreciably improved in over 90 years, and the cost of weapons has gone up. The difference is the lunatics, not the weapons. Banning certain types of weapons is a silly false sense of security. Lets talk about strict enforcement, strict penalties,

You know what I find most amusing about the last two mass murderers. They were left leaning. Not right-wing nut jobs.

Yes, I’m resorting to insults. You’re an idiot.

I’m all for gun control measures (Even new ones), but I’m not for any law or person that says “you don’t need to have that” because it is pointless, a false sense of security, and imposes restrictions on me that have no effect on the problem.

.

I already said there is no tolerance for sexual harassment. But what’s happening is that men are are more and more fearful of any showing any affection and it is dehumanizing our interactions. Additionally, you’re going to see more and more hiring discrimination because for many employers, it just isn’t worth the

This issue a Western Feminism issue. I can tell you from first hand direct knowledge that in almost the entire hispanic/latino world outside the United States it is basically expected of you by the women to show them interest and affection. It is so refreshing to not have every single sign of affection judged to be

“dodgy contract”

It seems like in this age of political correctness a subset of people think that companies should just allow their employees to do WETFTW even if it impacts the business.

“an unfair burden” ...what a crock of shit...

Since you’ve decided to take a hostile tone to the issue I’d suggest you lay down for a nice cuddly sleep in the bed you made.

try listening to it

I know most here are like “Republican spoke, fuck whatever he said” but I’m independent, and aside from some people’s desire to ridicule anything remotely approaching religion I’m trying to figure out what he said in this instance that was so explosive or inflammatory. He said “lets not rebuild a house 40 times, lets

You’re arguements of white privilage and black appropriation fall on my deaf ears when it’s made clear by the facts that:

I wonder how much money (100.00 in this case) is wasted fighting over this word, that could be better used maybe feeding a starving kid or something actually important. We’re way off base with our priorities as a society. It is kind of depressing. I’ll take on anyone who wants to debate me on that.

Whether people want to admit it or not the vast majority of SJW feign outrage to advance their social/political agenda. Many more follow them for fear of losing money. Most people black and white don’t actually care about the word being used. It’s kind of comedic that we waste so many resources fighting over a word.

This is shocking and surprising to three groups.

You all are friggen rediculous. The whole problem with your arguement, ESPECIALLY the fish pictures is that you’ve all of a sudden decided that a fucking picture is a bigger problem to solve then something else, like anything else that is an actual problem facing humanity. If people can take pictures next to their