Now, I'm not one to defend Hugo, but... where does he say that a girl should anally rape her boyfriend?
Now, I'm not one to defend Hugo, but... where does he say that a girl should anally rape her boyfriend?
<3
I don't think anyone is saying that.
What about fingers? Or are they too phallic for you?
No one should ever try a new sex act without asking.
I know a dominatrix who refuses to use the term “pegging” in her play at all, from her or from her male partners. To paraphrase: if a man wants to get ass-fucked, he needs to say as much. Stop trying to pretty up and make it anything less than what it is, which is ass fucking.
So, I disagree with this article, because I know plenty of men who enjoy being pegged who don’t respect women and are in fact misogynistic. That said: I do think it can be very telling to get to the root of why a man is anti-pegging. I mean, sure, many people just don’t like certain sexual acts; not everyone enjoys…
+1
In addition to the elliptical, you should look into weight exercises, which burns a surprising amount of calories and will boost your metabolism. Also, if you start with weights then move to the elliptical, you'll burn more calories on the elliptical than you would without starting with weight.
Someone's rather sensitive...
I feel the overwhelming, hopeless horror you refer to regarding essentially all of United States’ history and society. The United States is a fucked up, sexist, racist, cissexist, heterosexist, ableist, classist country. There’s no escaping it.
Uhh, they're illegally occupying the Gaza Strip. The vast majority of countries recognize this. The UN recognizes this.
This comment is so on-point. I'm tired of people telling me I didn't "get" the joke, that it was "satire." I got the joke; it just wasn't funny. I got that it was *supposed* to be satire, but it failed as satire. And when the joke is indistinguishable from the greater society's beliefs... where is the satire,…
Unnecessary rant time:
"Then you should know better."
I don't think that theoretically no fantasy is unhealthy or dangerous. I just don't think fantasies alone warrant institutionalization.
So, even though there's no proof, your instinct is to institutionalize people based on their fantasies?
I completely disagree with your interpretation. I understand the "thought police" statement as referencing the text quoted from the Jezebel article:
Actually, there's no proof that anyone fantasizing about anything will lead to a greater chance of acting out said fantasy. I don't think it's dangerous for pedophiles to fantasize about children, or people who are into gore to fantasize about cannibalism, as long as they maintain the mental functions to understand…