This would make a great post on the online discussion portion of my freshman year civics class
This would make a great post on the online discussion portion of my freshman year civics class
“NO YOURE THE ONE WHO’S BAD AT LOGIC”
Have you actually read anything on the Kane trial? He was clearly falsely accused. He had the fucking DA going after him and they found nothing on him, plus the whole falsifying evidence thing... Chapman wasn’t even on the Cubs when he pulled that shit. Sounds like you were never that involved in Chicago sports in…
And you’re a white, uncomfortable poly sci major who makes minimum wage with roughly 6 figures of college debt you have no intention of repaying. We both know I’ve got you nailed as well.
Alternatively, you can just call everyone a bigot and not ever address underlying issues that cause such views.
You sound like a wonderful, accepting person
It is an equally tired refrain from her supporters, that she is not a horrible person. She will be raining bombs down on innocent people in the Middle East. Her supporters don’t get to absolve themselves of supporting that.
I almost agree with you except for the part about her caring about this country. From what I’ve observed she only cares about her power. Anyone that would slit a puppy’s throat for a vote only cares about getting elected, not the country.
My problem with this election is I think Hillary and the Donald both are really bad people. I feel like Hillary won’t ruin this country and it means something to her. But she is an awful individual. I swear she would slit a puppy’s throat for an extra vote. The problem is Trump would slit two for an extra dollar and…
Or perhaps it’s because the market is as overvalued as it’s been since the 2008 crash and 2001 downturn?
The Concourse is now Gawker 2.0 — didn’t you get the memo?
Your mom did seem a little slow, so yes, I guess, technically, I am fucking moron.
Because this is Deadspin, and any chance in insert (pardon the pun) a comment that slams Trump, Peter Thiel, and/or Curt Schilling should be expected.
Well, they liked him for like 20 min post debate, but then everyone else started liking him so it wasn’t cool anymore, so the edgiest stance was against Ken, so they went with that.
Is this why you’re digging up Ken Bones’s internet skeletons? Cause he don’t love you?
Harambe died so Ken Bone could live.
I normally make a mental jag-off motion when people whine about click-baity heds, but in this instance, I kinda see where he’s coming from. From the LA Times:
Based on its lack of thought as to the subject-matter, I had a hard time believing Feinberg didn’t write this article.
Don’t real journalists edit out the “ums” and “uhs” of their interview subjects?
“Hey, where’s the most appropriate place to post this now that we don’t have a news site?”.