mitchkelleher
Mitch Kelleher
mitchkelleher

I regret not buying them when they were $25-30k. I knew they’d go up and it would be great to own while it appreciated, but . . . I was stupid.

The angled V-grille is still an improvement over the usual flat shape they had, so they considered it, but in a different way.

That sucks. Poverty really is like a maelstrom and, once someone is pulled in, it’s extremely difficult to get away from it without outside help or maybe some windfall and the education to take advantage of it. The whole system is set up to keep people there and I don’t know what advice there can be for that.

Exact thing happened to me. Goddamn thing ran perfect—actually still does!—but burns coolant until it warms up that could clear the everglades of mosquitoes. No sign of a bad head gasket and a Ford TSB states that the fix for this symptom is a new engine (there’s a class action suit going on right now about it). With

If I still had any respect or positive associations with BMW, I suppose I would have something negative to say about this, but the BMW that built that M1 is long gone and this thing is pretty much all I think of when BMW is mentioned.

The key to design is in the proportion. I understood that when I was a kid in the mid ‘80s and Micro Machines came out. They got the details right, but the proportions were terrible, so I had no interest in them. Exaggerating the correct proportions could work well, but these aren’t about design, they’re about selling

why are there so many vents on something that should probably be watertight, particularly when they’re below what looks to be the waterline or close enough? And the forward facing intakes are perfect for ingesting a massive, sudden wave of water. And . . . I could go on for a while, but why? ND.

And ever more cars need or don’t drive as well without premium fuel as well.

In this market, that’s about the price of a 10-year-old 4-cylinder Camry with 120k. Definite scam.

Even saw one here in MA. It was half peeled off, but morons are everywhere.

Absolutely. You would retard the spark for starting. Some engines also had compression releases to aid starting and cars with impulse magnetos only required about a 1/4 turn to start.

Plenty of leverage from the prop on earlier engines, which weren’t as powerful.

I don’t like more than maybe 2 Ferraris since Enzo’s death and the LaFerrari isn’t one of them. As a whole, they only seem to get uglier since they dumped Pininfarina, so I was all ready to grimace at looking at whatever ugliness I was about to see, but I actually like it. For years now, I’ve been waiting for a

Sounds like an awfully expensive proof of concept. I suppose they only want to alter the orbit minimally, but I would think it would make more sense to latch on and use the thrusters to move it as probably a more applicable test. Obviously, I’m not an astrophysicist, but it just made me think about how, when one

I’m not going to be the standard opinion as I was never all that interested in any of the Supras (I’m an old and I don’t suffer from nostalgia)—they were fine, just not my thing. I don’t care about the BMW connection for provenance or whatever nonsense (the Supra started out as damn Celica, anyway) and the looks in

As someone who’s lived near the Atlantic ocean north of Boston most of their life, the Pacific coastline is gorgeous. I drove cross country for the Pebble Beach car week and that was the best thing I saw. The Monterey Bay Aquarium was great, too.

Holy shit that is a nice red!

I’ve only been in a few crashes and one—which was my fault—was a minor rear-ending of a Stirling. WTF are the chances of hitting that? Even in 1995, those were about as common as tails on people and I used to say that I hit the last existing Stirling in New England. THIS guy lands on a Jaguar. I live in an affluent

Unfortunately, it’s everywhere.

Hahaha, glad to see I’m not the only one!