Norway shares a border with Russia as does North Korea.

Typical sadistic Kiwi.

This video is not new. I think it’s about 5 years old.

If you compare his ability against his peers, he is one of the greatest players of all time.

I would be interested in seeing a Blood Meridian adaptation, but I have no idea how it would be done.

Yes, most scholars don’t agree with ISIS. So? That doesn’t mean that ISIS isn’t religious. Are Christian fundamentalists not religious because they think the Earth is 6,000 years old?

Oh, they’re very religious. Everything they’re doing is in accordance with the Quran and what Muhammad did. I just hope their theology will be squashed.

I wrote to my members of Congress. Unfortunately my senators are Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul, but it can’t hurt.

People finally realized that Bourbon is better than Scotch.

Besides what falconflyer1 said, there is an advantage for White because White moves first. This leads to different strategic positions for each side where each piece is used differently.

The photon is the force carrying particle of electromagnetism. I believe it would be more accurate to say the electromagnetic force (electromagnetic quantum field) produces photons.

...damn time loop. I hate this...

Unfortunately, all evidence is that consciousness is a product of neural activity. And this study surely doesn't overturn that (despite the first line of the article).

No. You're reading the graph incorrectly. The scores given are on the left, the scores received are on the top. Atheists scored Evangelical Christians (not broken down) a 28.

Dark Energy. What is it? Why does it exist? Why is it so much weaker than the calculated vacuum energy from quantum mechanics?

...damn time loop. I hate this...

...stupid time loop. I hate this...

If by intelligence you mean being about to decipher ambiguous sentences, then sure, it's intelligent. But I don't think that's the goal of many people working in AI. Many are looking for "general" intelligence. Is a desktop computer program "intelligent" because it can beat the best human chess players in the world?

I agree (but that's how it's often presented). But anyway, I was referring to this WSC.

This test still has serious problems: it's not a test of intelligence, it's simply a test of a computer program's ability to interpret ambiguous syntax.