I don’t think the OP plays Diablo 3. Which is fine, but at least look into what you’re writing about.
I don’t think the OP plays Diablo 3. Which is fine, but at least look into what you’re writing about.
“Sexual violence is incredibly common. Crap like this contributes to that.”
what the fuck is that supposed to mean? use your words, like an adult. fucking idiot.
Not really, Sony did it with Portal 2 on ps3 and before that FFXI on ps2
PS4/Steam cross play was supported by Rocket League already.
Say whatever you want, call me PC elitist, but this is the reason why PC gaming is the best. A game released in 2000 recieve a patch to be playable on current software. 16 years after release! I know not a lot of companies do that, but almost any game with some following has a mod that lets it run on current OSs. In…
Watch the commentary from Valve regarding TF2 and how important it is for a sillouhette that it provides you with all the relevent information about a player instantly. If I recall Valve said that the order of information you should obtain when seeing a player in an FPS is
1) What team they’re on (covered in Overwatch…
I just want to expand upon this briefly, I really feel that Blizzard somehow got lost here in making a story driven game without a campaign and can’t seem to let go of that. You witness their talks about the maps and they tell you about fine details like posters and nods to the story. But none of this is evident in…
While they waste time on this Ive been waiting for a Draenei or Gnome hero :(
The issue about silllohettes was one I brought up tot he devteam at Blizzcon and they just dismissed it saying that once you paly it enough you will recognize alll these characters instantly still. I’m sorry but this is where I slowly lost my faith in this game that they focused more on look than on gameplay. When…
you gotta be kidding with me. that scene is still one of the best sex scenes in video games. and how can I take your opinion seriously when you show an ass creed game as better example?
Yeah, and Amazon also expects that when they sell me the kindle that part of the recouping of the loss they take on every device sold is that I will, in good faith, buy books from their kindle store, which I don't. I assume that this is wrong as well. Frankly, I see no difference between removing the ads and using…
I understand the *intention* of the device. But really, I look at it more like this:
It's not really stealing. More of a grey area.
I have to say that I'm kind of surprised at a lot of the reaction to this article. I'm a frugal gentleman who recently bought the ad-supported kindle, and while I don't have any issue with the ads because 98% of the time the cover is closed and I can't see them or I'm reading, I'm surprised with all the people…
Backwards thinking like "I bought it, I own it"?
"If you do this, keep two things in mind. Future updates might disable this functionality (it's easy to detect and easy to do a workaround, if you're a Kindle programmer), so check before you update. Also, you're basically taking upwards of $30 from Amazon by doing this, depending on how many ads you've already seen.…