missnormadesmond
MissNormaDesmond
missnormadesmond

Try refreshing the page. That seems to have solved the problem for me.

I got that. I think a lot of people did, and were agreeing with you, but pointing out that it’s a bullshit aesthetic, without the intermediate step of making it clear they knew you weren’t espousing the idea.

It’s also what she would have had to do to avoid having her kids yanked by DCFS. While I’m dubious that anyone with Jolie’s wealth and fame would actually lose custody of their children, it’s technically what’s supposed to happen in such a situation.

Psssst — tongue in cheek. In case that wasn’t auto-correct. Also, I think you’re probably right, but it was still pretty heavy-handed. Or tongued. Or whatever.

I just watched that this afternoon (for the umpteenth time). I love that movie.

I could watch this all day. I think I will.

Happens to the best of us.

He probably is. That would explain why his political leanings aren’t very coherent or well-thought-out.

We’re Fahrenheit. The rest of the world is Celsius, or centigrade.

Yeah, it’s odd. I mean, what you said in your first comment is undeniably true. The second comment is a bit harsher, and I don’t know if I agree about Guest’s being just as insulting to his characters and audience as Sandler is — mainly because I don’t watch Adam Sandler movies. But lord, it’s just an opinion on the

I don’t totally agree with you, but I’m kind of enjoying watching how offended people are getting because someone doesn’t love what they do.

Sherpa? I never even met her!

This is the Washington Post. It’s supposedly not a tabloid. It was once one of the great American newspapers. Sigh.

I just did the big loud laugh that scares the cats.

Yeah, I have mixed feelings about that. On the one hand, I do get seeing this and thinking, “OMFG, I need to show this to someone because it’s just too goddamned weird,” especially if the recipient was sort of young and inexperienced herself. On the other hand, I’ve known people on the autism spectrum who might have

Yeah, if you weren’t convinced by John Does 1-149, I guess it makes sense to be skeptical about John Doe 150.

Or a True Scotsman?

Is it Wayback Wednesday? This appears to be a headline from 1998.

Indeed. His position is hardly original.