Plus having a video of some women consenting doesn't mean all of them did. It's an odd defence if you ask me.

I'm thinking he at least some of the time tests the waters to see if a chick is down without first talking it out in detail. That is a BDSM no-no.

That was great. I am nowhere near them but I would go if I could!

slow clap

You asked, women answered, and you won't listen. So you don't give a rat's ass if we feel harassed, you want to convince us NOT to feel harassed and upset so you can continue doing what you like to us.

When is the last time a dude said "hey" or "smile" or "good evening" to you? Oh yeah never, cos they dont wanna bang you. They're trying to get attention to get laid. We know what that "good evening" means, dude.

I always use "girlfriend". They get it faster - they tend to realize that they aren't defending those men, but their own right to hit on women. But if they imagine a man doing the same to their girl, they see it in context.

I always ask if they would be cool with a dude saying "hey" to their girlfriend. Suddenly they get it.

Men who "don't get" how this is harassment need it explained through their own sense of ownership. So I ask: How would you feel if one of these men said, "Smile" and "Hey" to your girlfriend? Would that bother you? How would you feel if one of these men said, "How you doing" to your girlfriend or your sister, how…

There is no logic in this movement. They say men are in positions of power because they work harder. But then they complain that there are more women in colleges and the workforce - didn't they just work harder to get there, like you guys said? They say "end violence against everyone" but they support men hitting…

They attract women of their same calibre, that's alllll I'm saying.

If you want a GF, you might want to stop thinking women are vapid and shallow from the outset. That's anger, probably anger at women who won't give you want you want, and women are easily put off and even frightened by angry men. So chill a bit, k?

Can a gross douche manipulate insecure women into bed? Yup. And that's a feat because...?

When the numbers were off in favour of men it was fine, though? Are you concerned with men remaining in the workforce or just with keeping women out of it?

So what do you blame for the victimisation of gay men? Women? Feminists? Feminists are traditionally more accepting of gay men than straight men or the MRM are, so I don't really know what you are even arguing.

Women may make up more bodies in the workforce, but get back to me when they even approach 1/4 of the CEOs.

Some argue that the victimisation of gay men may be more prominent than that of gay women because gay men are perceived as being womanly men - and a man who defers to "feminine" qualities is the source of more repulsion and perceived sexual threat to other men. It can be said the hatred for gay men is an extension of…

Don't forget "manginas". The MRM is pretty hostile to gay men because, I imagine, they are feminine. What could be worse than a feminine man, right? That's patriarchy for ya.

Oh for god's sake, you really, really have to stop with the "there was a man in Canada" and "there was a woman in Canada" and the "girls in my women's studies group". It's extremely wishy-washy and doesn't really prove anything. Find yourself a study that looks at media representations of female versus male child…

I feel like you might develop a lot as a person and an activist when you get past personal anecdotes and annoying Facebook posts as evidence.