Yes. And? Is this something unique that never happens in Hollywood or…?
Yes. And? Is this something unique that never happens in Hollywood or…?
So when an actor/actress in his/her 30s is playing a teenager that's totally OK but when JL plays someone in her 30s for 2 roles is bad?
She wasn't "several years a widow". She was a recent widow.
The character she plays in AH is called Rosalyn and is in her 20s.
Unless they get a white actor for Fidel, there's no whitewashing so far. Or you didn't read the article?
Only two movies she was younger than the character. Only. Two. Movies.
lol!
Nah it's amazing, you should definitely listen to it. It was Anderson who told him to record the conversation.
indeeddddddddddddd
You have everything wrong. She turned 25 this August. In AH she was playing a woman in her 20s (even the movie acknowledge her age) and in SLP she was in her late 20s/early 30s.
I would have put Hannibal in the top 5 but thanks for keeping the love <3
Who cares if he was, though? It doesn't matter. Millions of people are/have been abused in their childhoods and they don't turn into rapists serial killers. Some do. Others have the perfect childhood and they turn into rapists serial killers.
I agree. Hannibal Lecter is charming. Kilgrave is a black hole of charminess.
Why you keep defending an obvious psychopath narcissist serial killer rapist? You think that he was made that way and that excuses his actions or that his behavior makes sense? No.
I was talking about the article o.O
ctrl+f = 0 hannibal
AVClub, you disappointed me.
Can you tell me in what part of my comment I'm insulting you?
That doesn't automatically makes you more aware of women. You know that, right?
A character can be male or female and can have the same freaking dialogue without any problem unless the plot needs a specific development based on the genre/ethnicity/religion that will change the plot of that character. Means, Hogarth's…
You don't know many women, do you?
Always :3