Haha but they're not though.
Haha but they're not though.
I used to think there was nothing wrong with review scores, until I realized something. Go on Amazon and look up Moby Dick. Then look up Twilight. They both have the exact same score, 4/5. According to Amazon, Twilight is as good a novel as fucking Moby Dick. This is a rather exaggerated example, but it illustrates…
I wouldn't recommend reading more stupid things. I always recommend more reading, but I recommend people read good things, and avoid reading the stupid ones.
The most accurate description of pre-order bonuses I have ever seen.
This looks like some awesome cosplay.
You know, there is such a thing as taste. Not everyone will enjoy every game. There is nothing noteworthy about this. You didn't even really need to inform us that you didn't like it because, truth be told, nobody actually cares.
Very nice.
Suit yourself. However, one's tastes are not superficial. Your tastes, the things you love, say a lot about who you are as a person. Feeling instinctively drawn, even superficially, even in just a very superficial "I like that guy" kind of way, to others who share your interests, is something a lot of people can't…
So you mean to tell me if you meet someone who is a fan of the same thing you are, you don't automatically want to be best friends with that person? Is that just me?
I just don't understand why you would read something like that into this story.
Such a profound statement. Perhaps, too profound for an internet comments section.
I think it's because you have developed an appreciation for mechanics. In old video games, mechanics is all there was. And rougelikes are pure mechanics. So your appreciation for mechanics gives you an advantage over others since, while being able to appreciate amazing graphics or open worlds or moral dialogue choices…
I'm sorry that you didn't have parents that showed you the things they grew up and loved. That's very sad to me. I grew up listening to old school salsa music from the 70s and reading classic literature. God forbid Listen to that reagetton stuff the kids were listening to. It was literally banned from my house (and I…
Here's a fun clip from tonight's Video Game Awards, where Bioware make a quick joke about why people really play Bioware games: the sex.
I see what you're saying. You can't separate form from content as they say, and having control of the form our thoughts take on the page is probably just as important as having control of the thoughts themselves. Considering how much effort I have already expended due to that error, I'll have to think about putting…
You know when you put it like that it does make a lot more sense. I should apologize because now I look like the dick.
What are you talking about? It's only nitpicky because it's in response to a nitpicky post. I was simply responding to a nitpicky post with some nitpicking of my own why is this a problem?
I was only posing that argument to kind f counter the correction, as I am a bit of an anti-grammar Nazi and like to decorrect their corrections whenever I can (also I know that's not a word, I just made it up). Obviously it does not actually matter.
But I'm not a grammar Nazi. That entire thing was about not being a grammar Nazi. I about the farthest thing from a grammar nazi as you can get, since as far as I am concern, grammar should be wholly concerned with clarification of meaning and unconcerned with establishing itself as a set of rules that must be obeyed…
It's autocorrect. It does it to me every time. I don't think that was a joke though. I mean if it was, it must not have been very funny. I'm an English Major and I didn't even find it funny. I did find the last part funny though. Be the first part was definitely a legitimate correction.