you say well before, but the C5 even had them up until 2004, believe it first was getting implemented in the late 2000's? It was first popular because the technology for headlights wasn’t there (glass vs. plastic) now it’ll stay dead b/c designing a ped-pro friendly headlight and having it be reliable/durable isn’t…

Also Quade one other thing, the NSX engineers for reasons unbeknownst to me is that they benchmarked the Porsch 911 GT3 not the Turbo models which the NSX does outperform to 0-60 mph.

yes, but compared to the 918 for example it’s approx 100 lbs more. however costs considerably less, but also probably performs quite a bit less as well, how much less is yet to be seen.

No not really mistaken I know you’ve been arguing the point for the Porsche Turbo which has one of the fastest 0-60's for all production including hyper cars with a 2.6s, the GTR is at 2.9? which is what the Teslas do as well.

Alright, was mistaken about the 2 differentials, so the additional clutch pack to distribute the load is instead in the other differential. Also those are axles or half-shafts that would still exist either way (you seem to care a great deal about technicalities). Sure you may say it’s semantics, but that’s also…

First your closing statement; sure potentially that could happen, and I agree that I believe Honda in the late 80's and 90's were more innovative than currently (I personally feel that way in general about the automotive industry).

Blame pedestrian protection regulations, not any of the OEM’s.

So your stance is that the hybrid systems in the McLaren P1, Porsche 918, and Laferrari were mistakes too, got it.

Differential systems at the heart, Mitsubishi system was called AYC (active yaw control). So this uses clutches to distribute power side to side, front and rear.

sorry for the late reply, you’re commenting on a different aspect, I was just regarding to the speed. Yes not paying attention to the road while you underride in the middle of a trailer yea it’s more than likely fatal no matter the speed. Your point was why doesn’t NHTSA or IIHS test at 70-80 mph I sufficiently…

Brake/torque vectoring and the torque vectoring the new NSX is doing is quite different.

Rarely are crashes at 70-80 mph, a driver’s avg reaction time of hitting the brakes than the end resulting speed can end up in the 35-40 mph range.

Everything one buys at HF will eventually be used as a hammer paperweight.

because Racecar?

oops sorry I think it’s a Subaru Baja looks like a cover on the back.

looks like a Gen 1 Forester late 90's early 2000's

As an ATGATT commuter I approve this video.

Riding on the weekends or off times to just cruise is nice and relaxing as well and don’t have to deal with as many oblivious drivers.

“I don’t even have my license so I don’t ride”

You should see the 42 wheelers in the Detroit area.