The constitution has a flag desecration amendment. But if putting the stars and stripes on your pussy is your thing, I stand by your freedom to do so. I’ve seen plenty on caskets so I’ll pass.

I’m not a parent, but damn I had no idea “cry it out” was so controversial! My sister does it with her kids, and that’s always what people told me when I was a babysitter back in the day! The more you know, I guess.

And retired people give to candidates at high rates across the board.

Since this is the The Slot, the obvious conclusion we are supposed to draw is that Hillary is A WONDERFUL PERFECT QUEEN GODDESS AND IF YOU DARE DISAGREE THEN YOU HATE ALL OF THE WOMEN WHO HAVE EVER BEEN OR EVER WILL BE! /s

Well, the labor participation rate in the U.S. has been hovering around 62% for a while, so this means that Sanders donors are more likely than the average American citizen (16 years or older) to be in the workforce. Which makes sense, since they have money to donate. I don’t know if we can really draw many broad…

Marching band taught me wearing the flag violates flag code.

I wear a straight up ninja suit because I’m so fucking pale I only have white bread dough and lobster as skin tone options.

And those that are just vote like that as a cover. Right comrade?

An American flag wedgie seems like the opposite of patriotic.

Like I said, white-guilt.

Yeah, or buzzfeed, or some other website. Pretty much. It’s why I can spend an hour on the internet and basically see every story from the day multiple times. They all copy each other, only adding the particular bias of the author.

I would certainly bet that you wouldn't condone it if Facebook was pushing Trump. You can't have it both ways and while I know it's hard you have to keep your mind open and see things from more points of view than just your own. If you would truly be OK with it if Facebook was pushing Trump then I can respect your…

I know you’re just a kid trolling for attention, but I will make one point in response. Categorically dismissing ideas as “wrong” (without even lifting a brain cell to say why) isn’t the principled stand you seem to think it is. It’s straight up intellectual laziness. THAT is why Fox News’ ethos can be…

This is that one article to keep you thinking that.

To be fair, most “journalists” aren’t journalists. Have you read a lot of articles on main stream media? The biggest example “journalistic” integrity that I think of is where they’re discussing some spurious study. The “journalist” in question has absolutely no ability to discern actual scientific evidence and…

True, corporate citizens can espouse whatever they want. But Facebook presented its “trending stories” list as somehow impartial. Apparently they were curating it *without telling anyone*. To me, they were being dishonest. It’s not a violation of journalistic ethics (as you correctly point out), but it IS douchbaggery…

If it’s true, it’s not just the right wing that will be angry. People already feel Facebook is manipulative and unethical; this is just more fuel for the fire.

Kudos to Gizmodo for giving this issue a serious examination. I admit that I would have predicted a Gawker site to participate in the very same hide-newsworthy-conservative-subjects editorializing that apparently Facebook did. Thanks for proving me wrong.

I don’t look to Facebook for news. For that I go to Buzzfeed.

The advantage of urinals is that you can fit double the number of toilets in the same space. Why do you think the queue to the male toilet is always shorter?