It is a money a thing. I am so fed up with "because this is what the market wants" as if people are not influenced by this huge advertisement machine which is worth billions of dollars. Women were big in programming before consoles were marketed at boys and boys started to have a better access to this sort of…

That depresses me. I am seriously not sure if we are going forward. This proclaimed "liberation" is often just further objectification of women, and it just reinforces the old stereotypes.

well, here we already have gender equality: gender won't save you from being broke if you are a genius artist

<3

Let's not forget the person talking has probably seen lots of violent porn - something this neoliberal wannabe empowerment stream of feminism completely denies is somehow connected. You guys really think they are not influenced by these images they have grown up seeing? I am just comparing to the porn I saw when I was…

yeah youre right. I was just pondering about my last relationship and the ironic tone got a bit lost on me. So, sorry for interrupting ;)

guys have you seen that on Bill Cosby? Quite crazy:

if that would be the biggest one - I actually envy you. I'd exchange illoyality, egocentrity, lack of empathy and dishonesty for smoking

no

It was always a dirty word for the establishment since it was always against the establishment

I know what you mean. The main character is actually depicted as broken for life by the early death of his first love, and in the process of life breaking another human being. It does have another layer though, since he is equating Lolita with his first love, so there is some mix up, though I agree with you it is…

As weird as it sounds I think dissing to the max is some part of the rap game. It's the attitude that alpha males have to prove this aggressive way of dominance towards each other all the time - it's actually a very poisonous sort of masculinity. So in this context, it can be seen as a compliment to Iggy, she is asked…

whaaat? and that was in his biography? that's extremly awful already!

Agree except for the "enablers" part. A rapist is a rapist - doesn't need an "enabler" - what is that even supposed to mean, that in some way she was his complice? That he had his motivation from her?

How that is not objectifying but only a problem of "style" is beyond me...

you think I should not visit shis page just because I dont like ALL things? Like the answer to criticism is "leave"? Nice.

wasn't my point at all..but that he using some supposedly "shocking" content just to get some clicks..

Its not about not wanting to see it, but I don't like his motives - he always presents anything with this touch of "shock! horror!"...um yeah whatever..

let me understand: your sole purpose as a writer is to write about sex, and this as "scandalous" as possible? Is animal suffering really just some way for you to shock/entertain?

That's all no joke" She is "taken"? Women HAVE SEX, we are not "taken"!