You’re an idiot. So instead of bringing in “three quarterbacks who have yet to throw a touchdown in their collegiate careers,” they’ve got a guy who’s thrown 34 of them, including 16 against only 5 INT last year. But he’s just a filler. Or you’re just a moron who didn’t know he transferred in until someone above told…

Huge Michigan fan here. I put $100 on the longshot for them to win the NC this year. I’m up to speed on recruiting and know every player and coach on the roster.

He’s just a filler? By that, do you mean a filler for the 2015 season? You know, the one you are trying (not very hard) to write about.

Thanks for blocking me on Twitter over pointing out your negligent omission of Rudock. “Didn’t think much of it?” Is that code for “didn’t look into it enough before posting?” You also mistakenly said that Michigan lost to PSU last year, but I see that you corrected that error at least. I generally enjoy these…

Blows up an entire paragraph of your hatefest though, seems kinda relevant.

Gotta call bullshit here. Rudock started for two years in the Big Ten and was by no stretch a bad quarterback. He easily has the best resume of the QBs at Michigan and is a serious contender for snaps. Writing him off as “filler” who wasn’t worth mentioning is such a comically bad conclusion that I’d just assume you…

“didn’t think much of it” = didn’t do my research and didn’t know about it until just now.

Aka, whoops just found out that this guy exists!

You’re a buckeye slappy so it’s understandable you would just go for a click bait uneducated approach to the Michigan preview. Keep swinging on those buckeye nuts.

Seems odd to suggest that the likely starter is just filler tbh

“guys I totally knew about the presumed starter, a top-half Big Ten QB, but decided not to mention him whatsoever in my lengthy QB discussion because reasons.” Well, I for one believe you! I look forward to the next 16 football previews in which you similarly don't mention the starting quarterback.

This sentence is the give away that you had no clue about Rudock: “Then again, who the hell knows if Michigan has a quarterback worthy of starting yet, so we’ll see.”

The core premise of your article was that Michigan will suck because they have no quarterback. With Rudock, they will have at least an above-average Big 10 quarterback. Since you admit that they have good running backs (despite ignoring that they also have a promising transfer RB from USC) and that the defense will be…