That’s why they didn’t say no. They are just making him sit on his hands for being a little shit. Which they have every right to do.

No make good comments

Well, there is a bomb.

There’s something worse. When an overseas design center of the same company you work for is touted as being fast, cheap, and wonderful so you tear down what they created and find they have violated every internal standard you’re required to meet. That their design could not and does not even come close to passing the…

Even the downside of doing competitor tear downs is removed because they are outside company. That sinking feeling when it becomes apparent that the cool things they did are prevented by the internal corporate requirements you have to live under.

Who’s gonna put it all back together again? I know just the man for the job:

And you think this story is “cool” for what reason, exactly?

Yup. That about sums it up.

blowjob-glamorizing outlet

Same.

No, that’s pretty much what I expected

NEW MORNING SHIFT LOGO

Seems?

I’ve begrudgingly closed several deals on Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep products, despite their subpar reliability

Wow, this is the kind of writing I’d expect from Oppositelock, not Jalopnik.

Ford typed that up on some sweet Cherry MX Grabber Blues.

I read somewhere that Gawker employs like 300 people, so you're 301 on the list.

Here’s a typical stretch of the A11. Not really suitable for bouncing off the speed-limiter, is it?

Your landlord learning stick on an old car you sold him.

I think the bigger issue is that Subarus generally lack trailer hitches from which to attach them.