My 17s have sidewall. Like 2.5" of it. If you can’t keep from cracking a wheel with that much sidewall, maybe try not driving through the potholes.
My 17s have sidewall. Like 2.5" of it. If you can’t keep from cracking a wheel with that much sidewall, maybe try not driving through the potholes.
Oh spare us. I live in pothole country and I’d rather have 17s than 14s on my Miata. Pay your taxes and fix the roads.
The base model tires also had measurable sidewall.
+1.
What is it with Jalops and the obsession with small ass wheels? 17 minimum. Even old cars. Enough with this bullshit, thank you.
That Fit looks ridiculous.
The optimal wheel size depends on the size and shape of the vehicle. I can’t imagine 15s on my SUV or minivan.
GM has shown that V8s are still relevant, especially in trucks, compared to on-paper-more-efficient smaller displacement forced induction engines.
The LS engines are the antithesis to DOHC. There is simply no compelling argument in favor of DOHC over an LS engine.
The LS is the only meme engine out there. LS swap everything is the quintessential reply of the 2010s on this site.
The LS is at least as qualified as any of the motors listed here. I don’t get the LS hate. It makes good power, it’s light weight, simple. Can be easily shoe-horned into just about any chassis.
Nah, Sorry.
He has replaced it twice and hasn’t told you.
People were willing to settle with the visibility when the 5th gen Camaro was popular. The biggest issue with the Camaro now is that it generally has less interior room than the Challenger, and the back seat is pretty much useless. The back seat was at least usable in the 5th gen.
I had an MN12 Tbird for a while, it was an amazing car around a mediocre engine and transmission.
I feel like the Camaro is legitimately hurt by its lack of visibility. I don’t think a lot of people even realize that’s why they don’t like it, but it’s a major bummer/stressor when you can’t see out of your car very well.
Jalopnik is barely here as is.
Jalopnik for sure
Depends how you define “co-create.” He did end up as the largest non-institutional shareholder, and I’m pretty sure he founded X.com, which became part of what became PayPal through a merger. Is that co-creating? It’s close enough that it’s not really misleading. Was X.com really worth anything, in terms of intrinsic…
Mad Bruh?
I imagine that Jalopnik staffers are currently rolling around on the floor as they do not yet have a grave to turnover in.