mikeydbeta1
MikeD
mikeydbeta1

Yeh, you’ve never seen any of his films.

This reads like a hit piece. Someone went ferreting through boxes of Allen’s work intent on finding evidence of misogyny and all they could scrounge was a few references to long legs? That was it? You’re comparing THAT to Philip Roth’s “The Dying Animal’, ‘The Human Stain’ or ‘Goodbye Columbus’?

The general consensus over on the TV Reviews section was the X-files’ season 11 premiere was a steaming pile of dog poop with a big reveal that made long-time fans angry. I expect the monster-of-the-week episodes to be roughly on par with ‘The Mist’ series quality-wise. So no thanks.

I’m getting PTSD flashbacks of the last episode of ‘Sherlock’. It was as though BBC had played a cruel practical joke on PBS selling them the rights to that.

I assumed ‘impregnated her with science’ meant Viagra was involved.

Season 10 even the monster-of-the-week stories were badly film, badly lit, badly edited, with bad sets. Nostalgia can only carry a show so far.

I was reminded of that Ben Stiller film ‘Less than zero’ about a successful Hollywood writer who gets burned-out on drugs and spirals.

What did you want them to do, expose the drunk coeds who grabbed their asses back in college and demand that they be fired from their jobs?

I hope it is insensitive. I hope its as irreverent as all getout. From the previews it look like its played as an absurdist farce, not a melodrama. The CW stablemate Crazy Ex-Girlfriend, 2 episodes ago, had the line “I know you, you’re the girl who sucks at killing herself!” Last episode the heroine browbeats a

Ah, but this isn’t a cancer story, its a ‘I don’t have cancer’ story. That’s the premise. The heroine is unexpectedly faced with living a long life that she never prepared for. It sounds like its the flip side of last years CW series ‘No tomorrow’ where one of the characters decided to live free because he thought an

That’s beside the point. Darryl was talking to a 60-something guy at Electric Mesa bonding over being the same age.

Recently Trump’s lawyer claimed that HE was the one who went onto Trumps Twitter account and, making believe he was Trump, admitted to obstruction of justice during a rage-tweet.

I’m reminded of a poll awhile ago that discovered most-everyone considers themselves the ‘smart one’ in their circle of friends. Most-every girl see herself as Lisa Simpson. Nobody sees themselves as Ralph Wiggum.

I haven’t read the review yet and haven’t watched the episode yet. Which is odd for me. I thinking I’m suffering a bit from exposition fatigue. I dread watching the characters just stand there explaining what’s going on and how they feel and what they’re gong to do and what they did do. This show would make a great

The show got a bit meta when George complimented Rebecca for her bravery representing ...um ...heftier women and Rebecca scowled at him in return.

The ‘genius’ tweet is overshadowing the one that came before, which is him raving like a psychotic. This is true ‘Hitler-in-the-bunker’ behavior.

The whole point of R. catching Josh is it solved nothing. It only made matters worse. Bunch’s story arc was not about ‘unrequited love’, its about ‘misguided pursuit of relief from her depression’.

Who complains about being old then references a rerun? Darryl at Electric Mesa was referring to meeting someone old enough to recall the original series, not Nickelodeon. And he was talking to a guy obviously in his 60s.

(with apologies to ex show choir member Suzanne, host of the podcast ‘Crazy Ex Girlfans’)

The CW kind’a messed up the broadcast somewhat. The ‘cliffhanger’ ending was immediately followed by a next episode preview that told us how the cliffhanger was going to be resolved! Within seconds, too fast for me to switch channels or mute the sound. They’ve done this before, given us previews or early releases of