mikeprickvivanneil
MikePRickVivanNeil
mikeprickvivanneil

Since you are obviously a space alien who has no idea how humans work, let me first welcome you to planet Earth. Now I explain this situation: There is a list of curse words that don’t have any meaning other than “I do not like you.” Then there are other words that mean things. One of them is “pedophile.” In this

It’s a good argument, in principal... but... context... he called the guy a pedo, made specific claims about the guy moving to the country so he could get himself a child bride, then hired an investigator to retroactively prove his baseless claims (clearly implying that it was much more than just trash talk to Elon).

I

And the fucking pathetic elon fanboys come out once more.

If you can’t tell the difference between a common colloquialism (either telling someone to shove something up their ass, or, in your borderline literate response, calling someone a motherfucker), and directly calling someone a pedophile, hiring an INVESTIGATOR to prove he is a pedophile, repeating the claim in

Just want to say that Elon Musk met with Epstein after the reveal of the pedophilia case...about 2 years later. You might want to Google that.

Everything praising him is a marketing scam by his own words.

When someone (Elon Musk) spends more time(hours) for PR interviews rather than the actual work (1 lone engineer spends a few minutes in the cave as the cave survey) that ends up with a ‘metal coffin’ that would never fit into the cave and isn’t flexible for a (obvious) natural cave...Any professional rescuer would get

AKA rich guy gets to continue accusing other people and damaging their reputation. I really shouldn’t be surprised at the US court systems of pandering to the rich.

My congratulations to serial child molester Elon Musk for beating this obviously frivolous lawsuit and I hope he can now continue raping dogs in peace.

It’s as though Tesla is trying to corner the pretentious douchebag even further.

The trailers made it seem like it was forcibly “for women” rather than being a good movie with women in it. It looked bad in every respect—awful music choices, unfunny retorts, bad action, unclear plot. In contrast, take Atomic Blonde, which has a kick-ass female protagonist that didn’t need to constantly remind us of

Was Charlie’s Angels ever really for women though? I thought the whole point was that it was super male gazey. (This is a genuine question; I’m too young to have seen the show.)

“To protect and serve,” right? The agency that tells us they’re essential for our safety puts a lot of work into not being found when you might need them.

THIS. And to say afterward that it was

Oh, it all about controlling a woman’s right to choose her sexual activity.

Welp, it’s Monday. So...