How many Chromebooks can run Final Cut Pro?

Better than shipping exploding phones I guess...I don’t want to start a flame war BTW

With apps like maps you literally need the data to improve the quality, hands down. How else do you want it to “get ready”? Hmm? Steal other’s data like google?

It came with a pair of lightning earpods.

A huge problem with Westworld is that we are watching robots spout extremely trite dialogue. It’s a way of signaling that we are watching a false narrative, but at the same time, that is what we are watching. So, when Teddy says for the bajillionth time that he’s got some “reckoning” to do, it’s just more wasted…

Here’s my problem with the show: four episodes in, and I have yet to develop any kind of emotional attachment or even response to any of the characters. I am watching a complex plot unfold, but I simply don’t care about the characters. All I have is this idle curiosity of trying to figure out what the hell is going…

LOL. I never thought I’d meet a Samsung fanboy.

douche

Good. This new McCarthyism is poison to any society that values free expression of ideas. I don’t want to live in a country where an employer needs to ask “Are you now or have you ever been a Donald Trump supporter?”

It’s one of the uniformed white dudes he’s complaining about. He’s just wearing blackface.

a+ for even including “compare surface pro 4 and Binders With Paper”, amazing attention to detail.

I mean this is karmic justice for advertisers when you jam your product where it doesn’t belong. If it doesn’t work people will find out. Then what good is your 400 million deal

“Hi! It looks like you’re trying to run an A-2 Gap Slant? Would you like help running an A-2 Gap Slant?”

My suggestion would be to understand the obvious source of confusion, in the preference for she/her pronouns for someone that looks so masculine.

Do you look at that monstrous bottom bezel and just ask the question, “Why?”

The disingenuous part is that it makes it seem like Apple is sharing data with law enforcement when instead they would be proving law enforcement with data if they were issued a warrant (which would then obligate Apple to provide that data). That has nothing to do with whether or not they should encrypt the metadata…

This is the second article about this I’ve read in 5 minutes that has used the language “may share them with law enforcement” which is disingenuous and should rather read something like “and would be obligated to provide to law enforcement when given a warrant.”