mikeisright2
Mike_is_right
mikeisright2

Looking at his stat lines, it looks like he developed control issues once he got above the low minors. Then he pitched all of 13 innings in 2012 and was in the rookie league in 2013, so that screams injury missing most of a year and then working at the Yankees minor league rehab facility. By then a 29 year old in AA

Nope. The pitcher has to first declare what arm he is throwing with (something that no other pitcher has had to declare) and then then batter gets to declare. They can both then change 1 time during the at bat, so the batter will always have the advantage.

He is the first true switch-pitcher. I remember that in the early 90’s there was a pitcher for an Ivy (Harvard maybe) that did it as well, but he never made a meaningful pro career. As others said, Greg Harris did it, but that is like saying Doug Flutie was a kicker because he drop kicked an extra point in the season

1) This was a rule they created after he was drafted to avoid him switching arms and then the batter switching and then he’s switching again, and on and on without a pitch

Its antispetic and it has that burning feeling that makes people believe it is working better. On the downside, it dries your mouth out something awful.

Its antispetic and it has that burning feeling that makes people believe it is working better. On the downside, it

Because you agreed to the terms and conditions. I am sure one of those T&Cs for an XBox One is something along the lines of “you cannot use this device in any way that negatively affects the revenues of Microsoft.... Failure to adhere will result in the device being rendered inoperable” or something like that. If you

If I was just a consumer, no. But if they had hired me to screen a secret movie (lets say they had already shot Captain America Civil War while everyone thought they were doing reshoots for Avengers: Age of Ultron). I sign an NDA, and instead of screening it, I report that its coming, and I write about the climatic

How is it unethical? Those testers signed an NDA and are violating it. This isn’t the same as some user who bought the device, clicked accept on the Terms and Conditions and pissed them off. That would still be legal since they accepted the T&Cs, but its a dick move and bad for business.

He has appeared in 5 games this year. In 3 of those, there were shouting matches, fights, bean balls and/or ejections. So you are right, its just bad luck.

The issue is imbalance. Baseball is the only sport where the defense is at 9 and the offense is anywhere from 1 to 4.

I thought they were just going to light his corpse on fire for all of eternity...

Asking an Isles fan to stay classy is like asking a dog to continue to be a nuclear physicist

No. Its more than NJ, you got NY, CT and DC there as well. More appropriate to call it the North’s embassy in the South.

If Bo is complaining 2 weeks from now, then I ding him in my personal opinion scorecard (especially complaining about allowing physical play from him). But if 5 minutes after I was so close yet failed to accomplish my work-life’s greatest goal I may not look at the big picture and be the “good sport” either.

I recall 1 of them being all ball, but it was a lunging swipe that “looks like a foul”. It was just like the Winslow non-charge call. The Wisc defender stepped backwards as contact (versus getting run over) so it looked like he was moving, and the call, which could have gone either way, looked like a block not a

What hurt the foul calls for Wisc in this game was what the officials called as a foul (both ways). They were letting all sorts of body contact on the low post, screens, aggressive denials go. They were only really calling dribble penetration calls (and even then only so so). With the exception of Kaminsky who was

Except NCAA rules prohibited 2 of those 3. You can't have teams in the same conference play in the S16, so you can't put ND in the East where UVA is the 2, nor can you put Okla in the West where Kansas is the 2. They could have put them West sure, but do you really think having to play both Arizona and Wisconsin

Being a better team has nothing to do with seeding. It has everything to do with who had the better season up to the point of the draw. Norte Dame had a greater ceiling, but this is also a team that lost at home to Syracuse after they had given up on their season, lost at Pitt, needed 2 overtimes to squeak by 14th

How did they royally fuck Notre Dame? They were 3rd in terms of ACC teams. So they could have either put them in the Midwest or the West (Technically they could have put them in the South, but they weren't going to put the 1st and 3rd ACC team (in terms of S-Curve) in the same region.