mikeieie
Mike:I
mikeieie

You really think that Jordan Peterson is far right? Not agreeing with a leftist view is now far right? 

I think Kotaku is partly to blame for the toxocity, the things Jason complains people like Yongyea do, is completely hypocrtical. Jason let’s readers know about industry problems while attaching his personal bias where applicable. Yong let’s us know about game issues while attatching his bias where applicable.

This isn’t subtle activism or anything 😂

Here’s the thing. You are fighting an uphill battle. Most don’t read kotaku, or reddit. They play games to enjoy them.

It’s honestly funny. Kotaku has writers that criticize sexual exploitation of female characters(fictional ones at that.) While hiring someone that exclusively talks about sex and porn. It’s baffling. 

I read Kotaku for the habit. However still don’t understand the need for a “journalist” to have bias that aren’t clearly laid out. Giving a game a preview like this with a title as you put it will put people off of the game because of your bias towards a certain story type. Just seems counter productive to useful

Someone that speaks facts. 🔥

Systems are run by individuals you twit.

Is hollywood run by left wing outward facing people is it not? This just is another example that people are liberal for the brownee points of their fellow liberals more than actually adhering to the ideology.

Yeah this is manufactured outrage, what they said wasn’t controversial.

People that didn’t purchase the battle pack can now have the dog is a main selling point I’m sure. It’s a free game mtx selection will be bad

Oh come on, the joke was funny. If people are actually mad it’s sad, but that’s legit worth a giggle is it not?

Yeah no, while I agree capitalism needs to be slowed, the idea that people that use means other than working to save money and then spend that money to make money should be demonized is downright not okay. Your reference said in jail for a pen. Well they shouldn’t of bought the pen and bought something worth value to

Nah, I just think that it’s incredibly a slippery slope when we start policing jokes my dude, if you knew me in real life you would realize, sexism, transphobia, and everything else don’t fly and I will defend in a critique of their words. However anything and everything can and should be laughed at, it helps us not

Yeah no he should not you psychopath. The article is a journalist said vs owner of the site said type situation which kinja has a problem with not being an objective reporting site which is where it gets it’s audience. His line about the people complaining creating their own boogeyman and the writer of the article

Where is the line when it comes to not having free speech? If it’s the  canadian and UK model of policing jokes then I’m out. 

Let me preface my response with two points. One I am a freedom of action person. I don’t care, if she doesn’t. Point two, I also don’t think twitch should be able to determined what is streamed within reason on their site.

I get the point of doing so, almost removing the harmful from the society in more or less sense of a jail. However I think addressing the core of why people are like this is more important than canceling them out. Unless we can make an adequate argument to convince them they are doing wrong we won’t correct their

Honestly, my issue is I don’t want to turn on ESPN and hear the opinions of players or on air personalities talk about anything. I watch ESPN to get the highlights for the day then turn it off. I don’t want to hear a 10 minute story about billy the Rugby player that did so and so but passed away. Even worse when I