Cutler is making elite QB money

Hopefully when he’s ready to retire at 50 we can get him over to MLS

“That’s can’t possibly be our client: he hasn’t hit anyone all year.”

NFL doctors agree the two men are not suffering from concussions.

he’s not wrong though. the amount of dick sucking rivers gets for one championship is obscene.

“The year before that they was wearing trash bags”

here let me remind you of something wonderful in these trying times:

All jokes aside...green is maybe over reacting here? I’d imagine if a retired employee of a company returned to corporate functions from time to time and during these times audibly and openly criticized the owner of said company I imagine that person wouldn’t be welcome back??? Not sure if that mentality is ‘slave…

To be fair, you have to have a drinking problem to regularly attend Knicks’ games of your own volition.

Yeah, he’d be mocked, because he called someone racist who didn’t do anything racist. That’s worthy of mockery.

I kind of get his point, but I must have missed the part of revisionist history where the slaves were spoiled, coddled millionaires

He’s well within the rules to do that. Cut the man some slacks.

Don’t forget that Petraeus was actually convicted of doing what Hillary Clinton was merely accused of doing.

“Planes goes into hangar or sit outside at an airport facility.”

“The plane is an eyesore!” -Some guy who probably owns a Nissan Juke

So in only two weeks Trump has ruined a dam built in the Kennedy Administration? Well, when California secedes they’ll fix it likety-split.

In a strange turn of events, Matt Ryan said he will also be skipping the White House event.

College basketball is better when Duke has a legitimately good asshole star player for everyone else to hate. I know it can be fun to mock mediocre Duke asshole star players as well, but having your villains actually be devastatingly effective at what they do is what makes the fight against them compelling.

Why? The one reason I can see for it in the article boils down to it being a derisive and snarky way to make the same criticism, and you as an employee of Gawker have absolutely zero grounds for trying to tell people not to act in that fashion.

I get why clickbait isn't acceptable to use for some sorts of criticisms, but how do you figure it's not acceptable to use in the case of a misleading headline designed to make people think that a fairly mundane article is not mundane? I take it to mean the same thing. You may not like that it carries with it a much…