What you have to understand about Conservatism is at its core, it is about preserving an in-group protected by the law but not bound by it, and an out-group bound by the law but not protected by it.
What you have to understand about Conservatism is at its core, it is about preserving an in-group protected by the law but not bound by it, and an out-group bound by the law but not protected by it.
Buzzing the cyclists before running them over is the real kicker.
And add to that he was driving a vehicle that was capable (read: the emissions systems were intentionally altered) of rolling coal. That’s like he was carrying an unregistered hand gun that he was brandishing and then oops shot someone.
We have here the crossing of 3 things
Rolling coal when a person is in the vicinity and when the individual rolling coal intentionally or knowingly causes that excess exhaust to contact that bystander is AT A MINIMUM an assault. They are causing their vehicle to “spit” on a living, breathing, human being that is worthy of dignity and not having his or her…
did not involve any criminal intent
I bet my left nut that his parents make voting choices based on “law and order” and who’s “tough on crime”.
A step in the right direction. Charge him with any and all crimes associated with his vehicle and the operation of said vehicle.
“My client is a young man in high school with college aspirations...” Who gives a shit? I’m sure those bikers had aspirations of a nice ride on a sunny day.
Fucking shitty ass parents raising shitty ass kids.
My client is a young man in high school with college aspirations.
I can’t believe I’m saying this, but it’s the Pontiac Aztek. If it launched today with cleaner lines, a prettier face and modern features, it would be a strong contender in the war of offroad capable CUV’s.
fragile and toxic masculinity.
fun fact, that burning trailer was there first, on it’s own, and they just rolled the jump up to it. have any of you actually BEEN to north dakota??