mikecharger69
Mike
mikecharger69

The 350z’s are cleaner, IMO, for the 06+. An 07 Nismo, based on the 380RS, is truly automotive art, IMO.

... until they are all wrapped around trees by stupid racers. Mark my words: It will be the next RSX Types-S; the car that costs more to insure than my 426HP 2010 SS Camaro because people will keep wrecking them. Eventually, it will be hard to find a clean, non-salvage title one.

Mine has 160k miles and burns a bit of oil and I still track the hell out of it. Runs fine and doubles as my daily. As you hinted at, if you are waiting for it to break down, you are in for a long wait :P

Hehe, I tried selling my sister’s old 97 Civic a few months back, which I still regard as “nice” seeing as my first Civic was a 95. It was beat up and some guy on CL offered me like 500 bucks. I told him I would not take less than $1500. His response was “Why not, it’s old af.” I found that odd until it dawned upon

For some reason I find it hard to break out of the mindset that 90’s are not far behind us, and anything made after 2005 is spanking new.

Correct...

So I like sports cars (sport coupes, for the exotic snobby people). I found this thing for my sister as she needed a reliable cheap car, but she wanted a manual. So I found the rare unicorn of Camrys, the 4-banger manual, and I honestly wasn’t in pain while driving it. That 2.4L actually has plenty of torque to mess

I live here and I will mirror your sentiments: I cannot imagine living anywhere else for cars. The wealth of good condition cars on the market here for reasonable cost is extraordinary. You can always find something affordable and cool or interesting here, from a 1967 Mercury Cougar with a 351C for $2500 to a 2003

Did you actually drive any of the models you’re trashing?

It always “grinds my gears” when I hear or read about how Scion failed because Millennials do not have money. I was the target market when Scion first came out, and as I have mentioned before, Scion failed because Scion’s were garbage cars marketed towards a segment that respected the things they did not bother

I’ll be honest, I had some trouble understanding this at first. I actually had to go watch both videos and read through this twice. I get that Toyota said “The hell with it...” regarding building its own entry level econo-box, and that rebagding a Mazda, or any other brand, is shameful, if not standard practice (think

I remember my own first track day. I didn’t wipe out, but I also wasn’t the brightest. By that point, I had already learned enough to be able to handle all my own maintenance, so my car, a 2010 SS Camaro, was in top shape.

This is a bad idea in general. Yes, you want your brake light on at a stop. But also, you want your brakes engaged at a stop AND your transmission NOT in Park.

If Tim has good credit and a healthy debt to income ratio, he can get and unsecured personal loan for as low as 10 percent APR.

I almost ACTUALLY want to put this badge on my 66 Le Mans.

This teen for President.

So I had to put “Nice Price” on this one, only because its just so damned hilarious.

You’re like a “Low-Rent” DeMuro. I approve.

Hahaha... For all the research that supposedly went into that movie (and I still do love the movie) they got some shit wildly wrong, not the least of which being the aforementioned trying to shoehorn some RWD SR20's into a Civic and an Integra.