So.. would it have been ok if a suspected serial rapist, philanderer and confirmed serial cheater was the first husband in the White House? Why werent you demonstrating against THAT possibility, about all the potential female victims HE would be assaulting?

Im torn between thinking this is in some way some cognitive dissonance on his part, and some sick, sick gloating at what he created.

I have a theory. I think its possible that there WAS enough evidence to indict Clinton, but enormous pressure was put on Comey to stop him from pushing a case against her. So he was stuck between his own people that wanted him to go forward, and the establishment that was NOT going to let him do so.

Objectively an inaccurate statement, subjectively, kinda true. Shes a TREMENDOUSLY unliked candidate. Even the people Ive talked to who were fully in the Clinton camp admitted they were holding their noses.

Thank you thank you thank you. Until everyone who is screaming about how unfair this is stops and looks at it objectively, we wont be able to learn from our mistakes and do better next time.

So? She could of and SHOULD have wiped the floor with Trump. It was her own weaknesses as a candidate that sunk her, not external conspiracies.

Well said. I know are myriad causes for the outcome of this election, but from my perspective the number one cause of Clinton losing is Clinton. Tremendously unliked, tremedously untrusted (we can argue the fairness of that bias), dogged with scandal forever, swimming in corporate money, bound and determined to start…

Well, an opposing viewpoint would be that there are a great many people who will NOT die as a result of this election, considering how desperately Clinton appeared to want to start a shooting war with Russia.

Often, yes. But Ive seen the situation many many times on here over the years where “troll” was used to denigrate an opposing viewpoint.

Thank you. Said it better than I ever could. Cause Id just get mad and stomp off lol...

Depends on what you consider a “troll”. Is it someone who has a sincere belief that is in opposition to yours? Because I see a lot of that on here and I must repeat what I always say... that is not trolling.

Well, Im sorry to hit back with this but, next time nominate a better candidate. You can blame other factors all you want, but in the end you nominated a DEEPLY problematic candidate, intensely disliked, and about as genuine as a plastic plant. You didnt HAVE to. But you let your desire for a female candidate blind…

You DO deserve this for supporting an utterly SHITTY candidate who couldnt even win against fucking Trump.

WTF are you talking about? Which candidate wants to have peace with Russia, and which candidate threatened to start a no-fly zone in Syria (which would lead to a war with Russia), and also said they would respond to cyberattacks (which we do all the time to other countries btw) from China and Russia with military…

Oh God now you sound like the Republicans. You never lost your country. Its still fucking here. We lost the ELECTION because we let our beloved DNC lie cheat and steal the nomination for Clinton, who was an inferior candidate to Sanders as was clearly proven.

Yet hes largely wrong. Putin is happy because he wont have to fight a war with America, which WE ALL SHOULD BE HAPPY ABOUT. We helped create ISIL, and fund it, and arm it, and gave it a home in the Syrian conflict which WE HELPED CREATE because we wanted that goddam pipeline to go through.

The problem is, theres a TON of perfectly good, fun games that you or I could be playing right now. More good games that I could possibly have the time to play. So unless something stands out in some amazing way, well, too bad, right?

We just have to eliminate the requirement of buying a car from a dealership and bam the difference is made up.

And that is the truth. But dont worry. Im not even sure hes gonna take office.

You know, if he doesnt start a war with Russia that could kill tens of thousands, Ill take that as a win over Clinton’s war hawk ways. But just call me crazy.