I still laugh at 'butt steak'. Hee!

Yes! finally, a way to give Yoko the recognition she deserves.

Yes, I think the easiest argument to make is that Paul was the most accomplished instrumentalist of the Fab Four. It's amazing to think how, at their most fertile, John and/or Paul threw away songs that made other groups' entire legacy. Their 'filler' even had killer hooks. Hell, 'No Reply' had like three of them.…

Double Fantasy and Band On the Run…
I don't know.

And you're vaping for no one but meeeee…

"I've always had bouts of Lou Gehrig's Disease and cannabis is the only thing that helps me."

Sir Paul was apparently one of the first celebs to discover (and quit) cocaine way back in the 60s. Same for LSD. He has already used and discarded most substances before the rest of us are even aware of its existence. Coolness points there, I suppose.

These 420 doctors have built up their practices from and for the express purpose of walking you through whatever hoops remain. They will prompt you, if need be, to say what they're required by law to hear. I don't want to say it's a joke, but it is a joke.

In that case…

"I've always had bouts of anxiety…and the only thing that's ever helped me is cannabis."

Waxman

And Your Bud Can Singe

Fixing a Bowl

Grass Onion

Seriously. People may want to listen to Leonard's monologue and see how many elements wind up as part of that coke ad. And are presumably cribbed by Don for his own ad presentation.

People have suggested Don got the idea for the Coke ad in that Oceanside meditation, at the moment of 'Om'. But it was Leonard who not only gives him the idea, he basically writes the ad for Don/McCann. "What is 'it' anyway? He's speaking to the connection people were yearning for after two decades of Madison…

Yep, and woe be unto whomever threatens an egomaniac's fixed, self-serving worldview. People like this have started major wars in that futile hope of putting everything back as it was. Futile, of course, because it never existed to begin with.

It's one of the more insidious aspects of close familial ties: the extent to which people grow dependent upon their reductive characterisation of relatives. If Jimmy, after all, is permitted to redefine himself, then Chuck is forced to do likewise. Within the McGill family who is Chuck if he not the older, successful…

That's a truly interesting parallel to draw from. Chuck's love of the law has the same whiff of convenient orthodoxy that WW's 'it's all for my family' schtick did. Or maybe the better comparison would be to Walter's almost fetishistic devotion to 'chemistry'. In either case, we see the bad behavior of the ego dressed…

Nicely said. This makes me wonder if there is an element of a tough-love, boot him from the nest sentiment in Chuck.